Random wrote:Misfit wrote:Random wrote:I wouldn`t call those players "top players", but I see your point, some people which do well in competitive games may not be that great at understanding gamemechanic and things like that, but some are and would be able to offer valuable insight for balancing.
Also, when looking at the leaderboard specifically the number of games is something that has to be comsidered, a player may get to the top in 300 games while being not that good, especially with a small playerpool, but a high winratio does mean something, unless they just figured out one playstlye they do well with.
Nothing restricts those top players from coming to forum and share their deep insights with the rest of us, and im quite sure that Eugen would be happily invite them to become marshalls afterwards. But alas, i dont really see much insightfull suggestions coming this way, especialy from those "top players". And this treat is no exception. Its basicaly a summary of what has been disgused by the whole forum community for months already.
Yes, there should be some "top player"-marshalls. And by that I don`t mean whoever is at the top of the leaderboard.
Im not gonna wade through a couple thousand posts, sorry. Maybe you can help me and link a few treats containing complete balance proposals? And i dont mean things like "lmgs are unbalanced, they need to be fixed).