another505 wrote:Shrike wrote:Well at least we have our own strategic asset. The HQ-64 would have been more favorable though.
HQ 12!!! stop asking for the 64
the 12 doesnt need a need model, and it is in timeline of 1989 , export sale for 1991
We will ask for both dangnabit! The 4 missiles of the HQ-64 are a huge asset, 100% more ammo.
Also what is everyone thinking about the DPRK Il-28? Personally, I think it's a waste of a unit. Surely the 300kg bomb could've been carried on a better, more modern airframe???