paccojl wrote:new unit, better stats, same price
balanced!!!
I think that picture says it all really.
paccojl wrote:new unit, better stats, same price
balanced!!!
Rabidnid wrote:NK has a veritable cornucopia of mediocrity to choose from when it comes to inexpensive vehicular recon!
paccojl wrote:new unit, better stats, same price
balanced!!!
paccojl wrote:new unit, better stats, same price
balanced!!!
SirScorpion wrote:thenosh wrote:[EUG]MadMat wrote:
American Nighthawk now carry 2 Paveway III bombs instead of 1.
Now let's unleash the Prophets of Doom ...
One question: Why?
I'm not complaining or anything, since I didn't get the chance to try it out yet... just would like to know the reason behind this.
Only US plane to have more than 30% of its possible load out?
Kraxis wrote:Ever since the big change I have wondered at the AMX-30 line. They used to be the only rather good mediums. Then the Leo1 got it's buff/change so it too was good. But the AMX-30 line didn't really change much, and as such it was suddenly not good. As much as I have hailed at the 'super AMX - bad Leo' situation, I feel the pendulum might have swung to the other side.
Of course, it might be that the AMX-30 tanks aren't really supposed to be as good, just like such 'imbalances' exists within various decks/nations.
But nevertheless this was a buff for the AMX. So let's not sell it short just yet.
Sgt._Pepper wrote:More Units are available to motorized mechanized and armored decks to make them more interesting to use.
Could someone make an example of that for REDFOR?? It's seems like all my specialized REDFOR are missing half their units now, like the T-72S for mech, chinese AA for mech and armoured, etc...
Czech. T-55 Dyna autonomy increased to 700km to match other T-55
[EUG]MadMat wrote:paccojl wrote:new unit, better stats, same price
balanced!!!
Keeping comparing transport and non-transport price is both useless and endless.
And work both ways ...
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 50 guests