I really would like to know the reasoning behind removing so many vehicles from specialized decks.
No T-72S anymore for GDR mechanized, for example. GDR has, even after DLC1, always struggled against heavy tanks, with not good ATMGs to pick up the slack and only relying on the few T-72S, our infantry (if the tanks somehow get close enough) and our 1x2 SU-22M4 to somehow make due. This patch gutted the deck and removed any little competativeness that was left in it for normal 3vs3 to 10vs10 play. All that is left is spamming infantry in sub-par IFVs and cheap tanks that can't even damage high-end tanks until they get to like 1700m.
What about removing all MLRs, uncluding the BM-27? That leaves the deck with zero options to either counter-arty or to engage fast moving backline-units like the Patriot.
But at least we got the Fla-MG SPW-152E now for our mechanized decks. So we can finally theoretically fill all the spots. Better than not having it there.
New version (v574)
Re: New version (v574)
Last edited by Wolke on Tue 2 Sep 2014 21:13, edited 1 time in total.
- Ultimaratio
- Chief Warrant Officer
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Sat 11 May 2013 11:39
- Location: Linz, Austria
- Contact:
Re: New version (v574)
Although MM und FLX stated out to play and maybe even test the game i doubt that. It seems that you have picked the units randomly away from Mech decks like the chinise one. 


Peace to the Shacks! War on the Palaces!-Georg Büchner
Re: New version (v574)
Marder 2 with obscene autocannon and 10 armor only for 30 points
BLUEFOR tank RoF increased
Patriot, ATACMS, F-111 and "we will not add tactical weapons"
...
KPVT can shoot 1400 m instead of 1200 m
I guess, it's time to take a break from Wargame again until DLC 3 or something like that will hatch. Or hey, switch nickname for NATO AI!
BLUEFOR tank RoF increased
Patriot, ATACMS, F-111 and "we will not add tactical weapons"
...
KPVT can shoot 1400 m instead of 1200 m
I guess, it's time to take a break from Wargame again until DLC 3 or something like that will hatch. Or hey, switch nickname for NATO AI!
-
- Command Sergeant Major
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Tue 11 Oct 2011 16:08
- Contact:
Re: New version (v574)
*strategic weapons
If they wouldn't add tactical weapons we wouldn't have any weapons at all.
If they wouldn't add tactical weapons we wouldn't have any weapons at all.

Re: New version (v574)
The time period from DLC1 to DLC2 was the first time redfor team filled up in lobbies without excessive waiting. Now we'll return to everyone wanting to play blufor and matches taking even longer to fill up and start.
Between this DLC and upcoming Skand DLC, there is little hope redfor will see much desire from players again.
Between this DLC and upcoming Skand DLC, there is little hope redfor will see much desire from players again.
Re: New version (v574)
Oh, my bad. You got it right.
- Mikeboy
- General
- Posts: 5354
- Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 21:59
- Location: Democratic People's Republic of Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: New version (v574)
Wolverine could really do with getting the Javelin S-15, as it was planned to be using. 55% acc, 2625m range.
- [EUG]MadMat
- More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
- Posts: 15499
- Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 13:31
- Location: Paris, France.
- Contact:
Re: New version (v574)
Mikeboy wrote:Wolverine could really do with getting the Javelin S-15, as it was planned to be using. 55% acc, 2625m range.
It was planned with a single Javelin launcher, yet we gave it the LML.
Since we ain't given neither the LML nor the S-15 to the Brits, there's no way the Canadian also get the the latter before them.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests