Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

User avatar
Solo
Brigadier
Posts: 3429
Joined: Thu 20 Mar 2014 19:45
Location: Washington D.C.
Contact:

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby Solo » Fri 14 Nov 2014 17:54

nrader wrote:
Solo wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't there a grand total of 0 F&F MRAAM multiroles not on Soviet?

Are you serious considering 29M as miltirole? these clusters cant kill anything so its pure afs without SRAAMs


Do you really believe in what you're trying to tell me?

It's the Mig-29M after all.

User avatar
Killertomato
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
Contact:

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby Killertomato » Fri 14 Nov 2014 17:58

It might have a joke air-to-mud loadout but it's still a multirole bird.

The Su-27M is the most useful multirole by miles and miles. I wouldn't mind seeing the F/A-18E get a similar capability with Maverick or even SLAM.
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?

User avatar
nrader
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 687
Joined: Tue 8 Jul 2014 14:27
Location: Donbass.
Contact:

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby nrader » Fri 14 Nov 2014 18:00

Solo wrote:It's the Mig-29M after all.

Who cares about the name if now it cant be proper bomber because of clusters?
Image

User avatar
Solo
Brigadier
Posts: 3429
Joined: Thu 20 Mar 2014 19:45
Location: Washington D.C.
Contact:

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby Solo » Fri 14 Nov 2014 18:02

nrader wrote:
Solo wrote:It's the Mig-29M after all.

Who cares about the name if now it cant be proper bomber because of clusters?


I'm all in favor of a cluster buff. However as far as multiroles go, it's borderline useful. Compare it to an F-16C and you see what I mean.

User avatar
Regnar
Lieutenant
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon 25 Aug 2014 19:41
Location: Islamic State of Donetsk and Luhansk

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby Regnar » Fri 14 Nov 2014 18:51

another505 wrote:honestly, about the mig29 holding lgb, i dont agree with that
yak141 could do that, I think mikeboy did that , (USSR marine has su27pu, so thats no prob in asf department)

mig29m could either get cluster buff, or switch to napalm
USSR doesnt have good napalm, but i rather mig25rbt do the napalm job

Napalm is useless, who cares.

MiG-29M is perfect for the LGB job.

User avatar
another505
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13128
Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
Location: Hiatus
Contact:

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby another505 » Fri 14 Nov 2014 18:55

why? why not yak141?
Image
Of Salt

User avatar
Regnar
Lieutenant
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon 25 Aug 2014 19:41
Location: Islamic State of Donetsk and Luhansk

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby Regnar » Fri 14 Nov 2014 18:56

Because it's objectively an awful plane right now while the Yak-141 has an actual role.

Although giving them to the Yak-141 would give antitank capabilities to a Soviet marine deck that badly needs them.

User avatar
nrader
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 687
Joined: Tue 8 Jul 2014 14:27
Location: Donbass.
Contact:

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby nrader » Fri 14 Nov 2014 19:00

In my experience, its 29M has an actual role, not Yak141.
Image

User avatar
another505
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13128
Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
Location: Hiatus
Contact:

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby another505 » Fri 14 Nov 2014 19:02

Regnar wrote:Because it's objectively an awful plane right now while the Yak-141 has an actual role.

Although giving them to the Yak-141 would give antitank capabilities to a Soviet marine deck that badly needs them.

??
mig29m could get a cluster buff , if that happens, thats a role
and If the yak141 becomes lgb carrier with r73, then mig29m could be ASF to replace yak141, it could hold more missiles and have better turn radius
Image
Of Salt

User avatar
nrader
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 687
Joined: Tue 8 Jul 2014 14:27
Location: Donbass.
Contact:

Re: Possible tweaks to the Polish Su-22 line or USSR MiG-29

Postby nrader » Fri 14 Nov 2014 19:07

another505 wrote:mig29m could get a cluster buff , if that happens, thats a role
and If the yak141 becomes lgb carrier with r73, then mig29m could be ASF to replace yak141, it could hold more missiles and have better turn radius

+1 Totally agree.
Image

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests