AFNORTH Northern Norway

User avatar
Vulcan 607
Major-General
Posts: 3911
Joined: Mon 31 Mar 2014 20:40
Location: Malton
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby Vulcan 607 » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:10

Yea good idea it annoyed me that nation's could be in only one coalition. (Here is hoping for Anglo American coalition) maybe add a few more coalitions like this to the game such as a US far east with us Japan and us Korea for us forces in Korea.

User avatar
[EUG]MadMat
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 15499
Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 13:31
Location: Paris, France.
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby [EUG]MadMat » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:11

Vulcan 607 wrote:Yea good idea it annoyed me that nation's could be in only one coalition. (Here is hoping for Anglo American coalition) maybe add a few more coalitions like this to the game such as a US far east with us Japan and us Korea for us forces in Korea.

Well, didn't Obama stated recently that France & USA were "oldest allies"? :twisted:

User avatar
orcbuster
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12362
Joined: Fri 7 Sep 2012 21:04
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby orcbuster » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:11

[EUG]MadMat wrote:
Vulcan 607 wrote:Yea good idea it annoyed me that nation's could be in only one coalition. (Here is hoping for Anglo American coalition) maybe add a few more coalitions like this to the game such as a US far east with us Japan and us Korea for us forces in Korea.

Well, didn't Obama stated recently that France & USA were "oldest allies"? :twisted:


Technically true :lol:

But I don't think Mediums and majors will ever be in the same coalition.

Medium/minor and Major/minor sounds like the order of the day here.
Image
Viker for ingen!

User avatar
Flieger
Lieutenant General
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri 15 Mar 2013 19:44
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby Flieger » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:18

orcbuster wrote:But I don't think Mediums and majors will ever be in the same coalition.

Medium/minor and Major/minor sounds like the order of the day here.


But in Redfor this means USSR + NK almost by default, and that would be a rather uninspired coalition with little synergy.


On topic: AFNORTH is a good idea, gameplay wise. :)

User avatar
BeyondNight
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2064
Joined: Fri 7 Jun 2013 20:33
Location: The Depths
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby BeyondNight » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:20

Can + USA would be workable

So would ANZAC + USA

Or ANZAC can into Blue Dragons ?

could Germany ever be paired with Denmark ?

... That would be awesome.
Spoiler : :
Image

Drogathen
Sergeant
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon 3 Mar 2014 07:56
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby Drogathen » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:20

It is true. Although that statement alone did America no favours, hence all the talk of going into Syria untill the UK voted no, and within 24hrs America changes it's mind and decides not to put in ground troops. Funny that......

User avatar
KattiValk
General
Posts: 6320
Joined: Tue 19 Nov 2013 03:39
Location: Houston, Texas (CST)
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby KattiValk » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:23

Anything to boost variety is a good thing.

I want to see an Anglo-American coalition.

[EUG]MadMat wrote:Well, didn't Obama stated recently that France & USA were "oldest allies"? :twisted:
I'm currently imagining a deck with both Patriot and Rafale. :?

User avatar
raventhefuhrer
Colonel
Posts: 2949
Joined: Wed 15 May 2013 08:47
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby raventhefuhrer » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:24

I don think that NORTHAG would add much that Commonwealth doesn't provide... UK backed up by Leopard 1's and good infantry.

Sorry to be a wet blanket, but I think there are a lot of more interesting coalition combinations.
My YouTube Channel is Raven Wargaming. Message me to request videos on certain topics.

User avatar
Canute
Sergeant Major
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue 2 Apr 2013 15:47
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby Canute » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:24

orcbuster wrote:
[EUG]MadMat wrote:
Vulcan 607 wrote:Yea good idea it annoyed me that nation's could be in only one coalition. (Here is hoping for Anglo American coalition) maybe add a few more coalitions like this to the game such as a US far east with us Japan and us Korea for us forces in Korea.

Well, didn't Obama stated recently that France & USA were "oldest allies"? :twisted:


Technically true :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLVV7e2FGpg
Indeed.


OT: I'd love to see an AFNORTH coalition. Especially if one or two of the new maps were European and/or snow based. For some reason it's not the challys and marksmen that appeals the most. Rather it's Fv432s, lynxes and land rovers side by side with Leo1s (the snow camoed NO version) and NM135s. It just screams ColdnWet Response/Muddy Griffin repetition exercises. =p
Image

User avatar
Flieger
Lieutenant General
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri 15 Mar 2013 19:44
Contact:

Re: AFNORTH Northern Norway

Postby Flieger » Fri 6 Feb 2015 20:26

BeyondNight wrote:could Germany ever be paired with Denmark ?

... That would be awesome.


Sure, Landjut:
Image

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests