NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

GARGEAN
Brigadier
Posts: 3496
Joined: Wed 9 Apr 2014 14:19
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby GARGEAN » Fri 17 Jul 2015 14:54

Razzmann wrote:Buff the Modernas accuracy :(

Definetly. This thing already have pretty crappy ROF. Having less acc that any 70+ pts blue tank just kills this baby.

User avatar
Ultimaratio
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 641
Joined: Sat 11 May 2013 11:39
Location: Linz, Austria
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby Ultimaratio » Fri 17 Jul 2015 16:27

Buff the Kommandosi!
Image
Peace to the Shacks! War on the Palaces!-Georg Büchner

User avatar
MILINTarctrooper
Major
Posts: 1911
Joined: Mon 27 Jan 2014 04:19

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby MILINTarctrooper » Fri 17 Jul 2015 22:08

Increase Range of the ZSU-57-2 right now its got shorter range than the Strela-2 and ZPTU-2! In anti-helo and AA mode.

The Wachregiment/Kampfschimmer needs to have access to the SPW-152.

The Grenzer/Auk needs access to Mi-8 Transports.

I really hate DDRs transport availability chokes. It becomes a shell game of...oh which transport do I need for availability or cost? Hence why either the SPW-80 or SPW-70 becomes a premium unit.

The issue with the BMP-1 is a very sore sticking point. Especially with its laughable gun. [And the reason for it not being taken even though it has higher availability bonuses...is that stinking gun...and how ridiculously flimsy it is.

DDR also suffers from too much...high tech/low tech seperation...and really lacks middle range tech filler. Heck...I don't dare pull out my Kubs....because in the current game meta...they are nigh useless...as is any other SA/Guided SAM system.

But then I go play NK...and I got overloaded with transport options...heck you can airborne massive numbers of infantry in the Mi-4/8 options...but for DDR its price/availability nerfs shell game.

And yes Leichte Schutzen need some love...and their ATGM is just a pee shooter, and you need to micro them heavily to get the best use out of them.
Image
52.2% 1v1 Ranked 32.2% Multi since Open Beta.

User avatar
CornProducts
Colonel
Posts: 2959
Joined: Mon 7 Apr 2014 06:48
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby CornProducts » Fri 17 Jul 2015 22:33

MILINTarctrooper wrote:The Grenzer/Auk needs access to Mi-8 Transports.


You had a lot there, but I think this is your strongest point.

Added bullets for the MT-LB and Mi-8.
Image

User avatar
Scolopax
Sergeant Major
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun 1 Dec 2013 00:50
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby Scolopax » Fri 17 Jul 2015 23:17

Helicopter availability (type, not amount) is really weird across the board due to the regular vs. special forces helicopter labeling.

To be fair with the ZSU-57-2, it is in the vehicle section, so giving it deserving AA range would mean it should go back to support. Of course, this is what most people advocate for. Another repeated suggestion is to make two types, one for support and one for vehicle (the Norks don't have to worry about this.)
Last edited by Scolopax on Sat 18 Jul 2015 08:20, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CandyMan
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2017
Joined: Sat 11 May 2013 01:24
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby CandyMan » Sat 18 Jul 2015 07:11

Leichte Shutzen squads still retain their regular training availability. You can't take them at veteran even though they have been reclassified as shock troops.
Image
Your standard pinko Commie swine...
Rabidnid wrote:NK has a veritable cornucopia of mediocrity to choose from when it comes to inexpensive vehicular recon!

User avatar
Tied
Sergeant Major
Posts: 298
Joined: Tue 5 Aug 2014 06:58
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby Tied » Sat 18 Jul 2015 07:22

PLEASE

take a look at NSWP shock infantry that arent mot-shuzten

User avatar
Drang
Major-General
Posts: 3705
Joined: Sun 3 Feb 2013 04:20
Location: Fighting on the edge of the world
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby Drang » Sat 18 Jul 2015 14:18

MORE MISSILES
FOR THE MISSILE GOD

User avatar
Flieger
Lieutenant General
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri 15 Mar 2013 19:44
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby Flieger » Sat 18 Jul 2015 16:38

Tied wrote:take a look at NSWP shock infantry that arent mot-shuzten


The primary problem of CSSR's and Poland's paratroopers is their limited deck availability. Just opening them to motorized would help a lot.
Other stuff would be nice, too:
viewtopic.php?f=155&t=51093


MILINTarctrooper wrote:The Wachregiment/Kampfschimmer needs to have access to the SPW-152.


Wachregiment: yes! It is historically accurate, fits the wheels-only ground transport options, and helps the cost efficiency.
Kampfschwimmer: no.

User avatar
CornProducts
Colonel
Posts: 2959
Joined: Mon 7 Apr 2014 06:48
Contact:

Re: NSWP: Last Call for Balance Changes/Bug Fixes

Postby CornProducts » Sun 19 Jul 2015 01:21

CandyMan wrote:Leichte Shutzen squads still retain their regular training availability. You can't take them at veteran even though they have been reclassified as shock troops.


Don't worry bruh, its in the OP already.

Also, anyone remember the Promet? No? That is because it was limited to GROM and Strela-2 teams for whatever reason. Maybe because the Promet has an AA gun? :?

USSR has the Skrezhnet open to more units, and the two are nearly identical. Adding to OP.
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests