I'm aware that not many people play marines decks; but I've just realised that Canada has ZERO marine units. Can this oversight be fixed so that NORAD Marines isn't a -5pts deck for no reason?
-----
While we're on the topic; make the CF-188 a Marine ASF?
Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
- DeckCheney
- Colonel
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Sun 16 Aug 2015 01:32
- Location: The Feudal Kingdom of White Suburbia- Seattle
- Contact:
Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
The USA is #1 exporter of freedom!
All other countries have inferior freedom!
All other countries have inferior freedom!
- SpitfireMK-Pony
- Warrant Officer
- Posts: 487
- Joined: Thu 6 Mar 2014 03:27
- Contact:
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
The reason behind that is likely due to the fact Canada doesn't have anything close to a Marine organization (or even regular army troops trained in amphibious assualts) Likewise, I would guess that their hornets don't have all the equipment on them to land on aircraft carriers, as they don't have any, why have them? (Or all hornets may be able to land on carriers regardless, I dont know much about hornets)
You can't give Canadians marine Decks if they never had any Marines.
You can't give Canadians marine Decks if they never had any Marines.
Last edited by SpitfireMK-Pony on Wed 26 Aug 2015 22:22, edited 1 time in total.

- Bollywood Baloney
- Chief Warrant Officer
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu 7 May 2015 21:32
- Contact:
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
Su-24s and -27PUs can't land on carriers either and they're in the Soviet marine deck.
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
Canadian F-18s do have the proper cable catchers IIRC.
- frostypooky
- Lieutenant General
- Posts: 4334
- Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 14:12
- Contact:
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
NK MiG-23 and 29 to marine pls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy7-HeMkDrY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBpKpoEzzak
(also S-5 firing should definitely sound like that and not wooshes :3)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qy7-HeMkDrY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBpKpoEzzak
(also S-5 firing should definitely sound like that and not wooshes :3)
- Mike
- More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
- Posts: 12409
- Joined: Thu 20 Feb 2014 01:09
- Location: Virginia, United States of America
- Contact:
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
Actually, I think the mortar on the LAV chassis is in Marine decks for Canada.

Courtesy of KattiValk
- Bollywood Baloney
- Chief Warrant Officer
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Thu 7 May 2015 21:32
- Contact:
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
Land-based aircraft being unavailable to marine decks is stupid given that "army" decks have unrestricted access to naval aircraft.
-
- Major
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Sat 29 Mar 2014 23:50
- Contact:
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
Canada can't really justify a standalone marine deck given their lack of a dedicated marine corps but there isn't any particulalrly good reason for Norad marines not to have access to more stuff, access to the Canadian F18's would solve a lot of problems for the US marine deck without being inauthentic as an earlier poster pointed out they still retain their carrier gear which is actually used to land on some of the smaller airfields in Alaska i believe.
I hope your buratino's die screaming.
- molnibalage
- General
- Posts: 6708
- Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
- Location: Hungary
- Contact:
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
Bollywood Baloney wrote:Su-24s and -27PUs can't land on carriers either and they're in the Soviet marine deck.
Because some Su-24 were assigned to naval air force... Su-27 should not be available in USSR marine deck.
- another505
- More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
- Posts: 13128
- Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
- Location: Hiatus
- Contact:
Re: Canada Cannot Into Marine Deck
Bollywood Baloney wrote:Su-24s and -27PUs can't land on carriers either and they're in the Soviet marine deck.
what are you talking about comrade?!??!?

Of Salt
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 31 guests