brroleg wrote:So, how good is elite mig25 with its 40% missiles against 50% ecm?

33% chance of hitting. 1% higher than that of a 60% accuracy rookie like the MiG-29M.

You can find it all on the third graph (if you search hard enough!)

elipson wrote:The top line of each colour represents the chance to hit for the plane with elite vet, the bottom line represents the chance to hit for the plane with rookie vet, and there are three un-displayed lines in between denoting the middle three veterancies (starting point is the "+" sign, with roughly the same slope)

yes, spot on.

But just to clarify, this is only empirical data. I haven't yet found the true formula.

Accuracy * (1+vet modifier+ECM) is a better approximation than what we currently have for our range of variables, but it's by no means perfect and doesn't explain values like those of 100%acc.

This old image shows the deviation of, on the left, acc(1+vet)(1+ecm), and acc(1+vet+ecm) from real data.

Here's how the data was gathered. ECM and accuracy were adjusted between runs.

I was actually surprised at how little time it took once I had a good method.