US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby HrcAk47 » Sun 19 Feb 2017 14:29

Bougnas wrote:Did USA actually use the V-150 variants at all? Apparently they always used the V-100 only.


Negative. And it should not be an APC. Eventually a transport for 2-man recon.
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

User avatar
Killertomato
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby Killertomato » Sun 19 Feb 2017 20:17

Bougnas wrote:Did USA actually use the V-150 variants at all? Apparently they always used the V-100 only.


The V-100 was basically for USAF security police and MPs only after Vietnam.

Deltas should realistically have M151s or humvees for ground transport.
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?

User avatar
wargamer1985
Brigadier
Posts: 3305
Joined: Sat 4 May 2013 00:36
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby wargamer1985 » Sun 19 Feb 2017 22:34

Killertomato wrote:
Bougnas wrote:Did USA actually use the V-150 variants at all? Apparently they always used the V-100 only.


The V-100 was basically for USAF security police and MPs only after Vietnam.

Deltas should realistically have M151s or humvees for ground transport.

M151 FAV for 10 CP wheeled transport and M1025 Mk. 19 and M1025 M134 as 15 CP wheeled transports. This dream needs to come true (but, in my heart, I know it never will)
APPLY TO THE GLORIOUS CULT OF THE WARHAWK! LIBERATING NAZIS SINCE 1939!
Image

User avatar
QUAD
Colonel
Posts: 2766
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013 21:17
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby QUAD » Mon 20 Feb 2017 06:05

Light motorized transports should have less availability but be 5 cp OR good optics. Obviously some need to come out of recon tab as well.
Mobile Units Operational :!:

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby HrcAk47 » Mon 20 Feb 2017 11:50

QUAD wrote:Light motorized transports should have less availability but be 5 cp OR good optics.


Why?
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

User avatar
QUAD
Colonel
Posts: 2766
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013 21:17
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby QUAD » Mon 20 Feb 2017 18:55

HrcAk47 wrote:
QUAD wrote:Light motorized transports should have less availability but be 5 cp OR good optics.


Why?


They deserve to be represented ingame but are clearly different from APCs. They would be hyper cost efficient but not AP efficient. (Say 10 units of Dragoner in their current rover that's in recon tab.)
Mobile Units Operational :!:

Guggy
General
Posts: 8645
Joined: Thu 17 Nov 2011 02:53
Location: peaceful skeleton realm
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby Guggy » Mon 20 Feb 2017 20:48

Ehhh nah I don't agree. I mean that could be a gimmick sure, but it's so easily argued for that to become the norm by citing realism that it'd just kind of screw things up.

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby HrcAk47 » Mon 20 Feb 2017 21:11

QUAD wrote:
HrcAk47 wrote:
QUAD wrote:Light motorized transports should have less availability but be 5 cp OR good optics.


Why?


They deserve to be represented ingame but are clearly different from APCs. They would be hyper cost efficient but not AP efficient. (Say 10 units of Dragoner in their current rover that's in recon tab.)


So, a recon bumrush of cheap, fast, soft vehicles with machineguns, miniguns and grenade launchers after they have offloaded their infantry?

Yeah, this can easily go bad.
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

User avatar
QUAD
Colonel
Posts: 2766
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013 21:17
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby QUAD » Mon 20 Feb 2017 22:47

It could be really fun too, and would get melted by an autocannon. Plus you wouldn't really be able trade in attrition at all.
Mobile Units Operational :!:

User avatar
Killertomato
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
Contact:

Re: US Changes: The Compiled and Proposed

Postby Killertomato » Tue 21 Feb 2017 02:09

Autocannon? It would get melted by small-arms fire, or another AGL, or any vehicle with any armor whatsoever.
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests