Transport vs. Helo Tab meta

User avatar
DeckCheney
Colonel
Posts: 2732
Joined: Sun 16 Aug 2015 01:32
Location: The Feudal Kingdom of White Suburbia- Seattle
Contact:

Re: Transport vs. Helo Tab meta

Postby DeckCheney » Sun 21 Feb 2016 23:30

throwaway wrote:Transports don't have to have that drawback because although a ka-29tb costs 40, you can't actually buy 1000/40 at the start of the match so for helorush purposes and helorush purposes alone it may as well cost 65.


If you think a helo rush is so undynamic... :cry:
The USA is #1 exporter of freedom!
All other countries have inferior freedom!

User avatar
chykka
Brigadier
Posts: 3387
Joined: Wed 28 Nov 2012 14:55
Location: Canada, Alberta
Contact:

Re: Transport vs. Helo Tab meta

Postby chykka » Mon 22 Feb 2016 06:44

yeah with cheaper helo's as transports it's a wonder why people wouldn't use a few infantry too get grounded and cheaper helicopters.
Image

Random
Captain
Posts: 1509
Joined: Thu 31 Jan 2013 19:05
Contact:

Re: Transport vs. Helo Tab meta

Postby Random » Mon 22 Feb 2016 21:15

The helorush concern is spot on, the ka is a perfect helorushunint if it were 45-50 points, with 10 HP, 270kmh, 80 HE2 rockets and a decent gun.

User avatar
Communazi
Sergeant Major
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat 3 Mar 2012 11:04
Contact:

Re: Transport vs. Helo Tab meta

Postby Communazi » Mon 22 Feb 2016 21:35

Were transport helo prices buffed at some point, in the same way Helo CV's were made ridiculously cheap..? To encourage airborne landings.

Didn't occur to me when I made this thread that the two may be related. I don't play 1v1 so helo rushing hasn't been a problem.

You'd have to be nutty not to bring out Ka's as a USSR player. Z-9's as China similarily.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests