DLC Inconsistency thread

Indian Summer
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun 23 Mar 2014 20:39
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Indian Summer » Thu 19 May 2016 23:13

Markenzwieback wrote:1340 suppression on the Lance? :shock:


it´s a n-armed missle.
I like it more than b5 bomber. :!:

User avatar
Markenzwieback
Captain
Posts: 1708
Joined: Tue 27 Oct 2015 17:06
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Markenzwieback » Thu 19 May 2016 23:26

Indian Summer wrote:
Markenzwieback wrote:1340 suppression on the Lance? :shock:


it´s a n-armed missle.
I like it more than b5 bomber. :!:

Its not a nuke warhead that is used in game. And the suppression should be lower than the B5 bomber, so I guess someone added an extra 1 infront.
Image

feeblezak
Lieutenant
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun 4 Mar 2012 13:43
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby feeblezak » Thu 19 May 2016 23:27

I think they took the DLC as an opportunity to shadow nerf REDFOR
Give the MiG-19PFM its 5600m Missile back!!
If Someone could tell the drivers of the T-72M1M's and T-72B's to close their hatches, cheers.

Indian Summer
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun 23 Mar 2014 20:39
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Indian Summer » Thu 19 May 2016 23:30

Markenzwieback wrote:
Indian Summer wrote:
Markenzwieback wrote:1340 suppression on the Lance? :shock:


it´s a n-armed missle.
I like it more than b5 bomber. :!:

Its not a nuke warhead that is used in game. And the suppression should be lower than the B5 bomber, so I guess someone added an extra 1 infront.


I forgot the " :D "
But if you look the impact, it must be a mini nuke warhead. :lol:

User avatar
Markenzwieback
Captain
Posts: 1708
Joined: Tue 27 Oct 2015 17:06
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Markenzwieback » Thu 19 May 2016 23:35

Dutch shock infantry not available in motorized specialization despite having wheeled transport. Is this intentional?
Image

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Razzmann » Fri 20 May 2016 00:08

ZTZ-85IIA should be 80pts like the Chieftain Mk.11

Spoiler : :
Image

feeblezak
Lieutenant
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun 4 Mar 2012 13:43
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby feeblezak » Fri 20 May 2016 00:16

Razzmann wrote:ZTZ-85IIA should be 80pts like the Chieftain Mk.11

Spoiler : :
Image


To be fair it's faster, has double the autonomy and a superior AAMG
Give the MiG-19PFM its 5600m Missile back!!
If Someone could tell the drivers of the T-72M1M's and T-72B's to close their hatches, cheers.

User avatar
Crotou
Colonel
Posts: 2604
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2012 20:36
Location: DM's keep
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Crotou » Fri 20 May 2016 00:18

Compare Leclerc with Kyu Maru Shiki. It's even worse now. :lol:
Image

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Razzmann » Fri 20 May 2016 00:18

The YPE-765-50 reduces the availability of both the Grenadiers and the Stoottroepen. Same with M113A3's + Riflemen ('90), Canadian AIrborne ('90) + Bison and several others.
However the XA-186NO does not reduce the availability on anything while being much superior.

Spoiler : :
Image

feeblezak
Lieutenant
Posts: 1110
Joined: Sun 4 Mar 2012 13:43
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby feeblezak » Fri 20 May 2016 00:21

PT-85 and PT-90 crews better make their one round count...
Give the MiG-19PFM its 5600m Missile back!!
If Someone could tell the drivers of the T-72M1M's and T-72B's to close their hatches, cheers.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests