DLC Inconsistency thread

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6706
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby molnibalage » Mon 23 May 2016 11:42

As I can remember the LAV-25 in VHC and REC tab still cost the same. Yes, with different avail as I can remeber, but IHMO LAV-25 in CHC tab should be cheaper.

User avatar
Sir Typhoon
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat 30 Jan 2016 13:17
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Sir Typhoon » Mon 23 May 2016 11:50

Razzmann wrote:It is a bug, has been reported like 5 times already and the devs already know it.


Ok, sorry :cry:.

codextero
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat 13 Dec 2014 02:52
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby codextero » Mon 23 May 2016 12:31

urogard wrote:
Otagan wrote:Is there some kind of justification I'm not aware of for the M109A5 NL has 6 seconds between shots while the M109A6 Paladin has 10 seconds? I know the A5 is more expensive so it's not imbalanced from a gameplay perspective, but it doesn't seem to make any sense as an accurate portrayal based on what I know.

SK K5 Thunder also shoots faster than the Paladin
So I think the Dutch M109A5 is mirroring the K5 Thunder


Thing is those have different loading systems from M109A6.

The Dutch A5 uses the same system as the A6, so there's not actually any reason it should shoot faster. The M109 that can shoot significantly faster is from 2002.

User avatar
Sir Typhoon
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat 30 Jan 2016 13:17
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Sir Typhoon » Mon 23 May 2016 15:30

Hi, I don`t know if anyone post this but, i will:
Riflemen´90 avail carried by M2A1 (0/16/14/0/0) must be changed for the avail of Riflemen´90 carried by M113A3 (0/16/12/0/0) and vice versa. I think that it will have more sense.

User avatar
Markenzwieback
Captain
Posts: 1708
Joined: Tue 27 Oct 2015 17:06
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Markenzwieback » Mon 23 May 2016 16:52

codextero wrote:
urogard wrote:
Otagan wrote:Is there some kind of justification I'm not aware of for the M109A5 NL has 6 seconds between shots while the M109A6 Paladin has 10 seconds? I know the A5 is more expensive so it's not imbalanced from a gameplay perspective, but it doesn't seem to make any sense as an accurate portrayal based on what I know.

SK K5 Thunder also shoots faster than the Paladin
So I think the Dutch M109A5 is mirroring the K5 Thunder


Thing is those have different loading systems from M109A6.

The Dutch A5 uses the same system as the A6, so there's not actually any reason it should shoot faster. The M109 that can shoot significantly faster is from 2002.

Make the M109A6 Paladin a M109A5NL stats clone please!
Image

User avatar
cramble
Master Sergeant
Posts: 179
Joined: Tue 24 Jul 2012 19:27
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby cramble » Mon 23 May 2016 17:16

codextero wrote:
urogard wrote:
Otagan wrote:Is there some kind of justification I'm not aware of for the M109A5 NL has 6 seconds between shots while the M109A6 Paladin has 10 seconds? I know the A5 is more expensive so it's not imbalanced from a gameplay perspective, but it doesn't seem to make any sense as an accurate portrayal based on what I know.

SK K5 Thunder also shoots faster than the Paladin
So I think the Dutch M109A5 is mirroring the K5 Thunder


Thing is those have different loading systems from M109A6.

The Dutch A5 uses the same system as the A6, so there's not actually any reason it should shoot faster. The M109 that can shoot significantly faster is from 2002.


The Dutch M109A5 ingame uses the wrong name, the name it should have was the M109A2/90 (dont be mislead by the A2.). In the 1990's the old M109A2/A3 underwent a update that took some years and included allot of things like the fire control systems ''VUIST 1'' and more things.
It should be atleast at the same lvl if not better then the American M109A6 Paladin.
But the full information on the updates is pretty hard to find.
''Our scars have the power to remind us that the past was real. We live in a primitive time, don't we? Neither savage nor wise. Half measures are the curse of it.''

captaincarnage
Major
Posts: 1915
Joined: Sat 29 Mar 2014 23:50
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby captaincarnage » Mon 23 May 2016 19:11

Tornado F3 (2 at hardened) has inferior max veterancy option to Polish Mig29.13S (2 at veteran) despite costing the same ($135) and having inferior missiles.
I hope your buratino's die screaming.

User avatar
Sweedish_Gunner
Brigadier
Posts: 3105
Joined: Thu 25 Apr 2013 20:23
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Sweedish_Gunner » Tue 24 May 2016 04:36

captaincarnage wrote:Tornado F3 (2 at hardened) has inferior max veterancy option to Polish Mig29.13S (2 at veteran) despite costing the same ($135) and having inferior missiles.


Isn't the F3 F&F whilst the MiG-29 is SA?
Image

User avatar
Xeno426
Carbon 13
Posts: 11965
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 21:27
Location: Acheron, Hadley's Hope
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby Xeno426 » Tue 24 May 2016 05:19

Sweedish_Gunner wrote:Isn't the F3 F&F whilst the MiG-29 is SA?

No, both have [SA] missiles.
Image
CloakandDagger wrote:And you're one of the people with the shiny colored name. No wonder the game is in the state it's in.

User avatar
RoadkillRodger
Lieutenant
Posts: 1148
Joined: Fri 9 May 2014 07:24
Contact:

Re: DLC Inconsistency thread

Postby RoadkillRodger » Tue 24 May 2016 05:38

The F3 gets more missiles though

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests