Markenzwieback wrote:Random wrote:If we talk about balance you first have to make an argument why it should be done.Markenzwieback wrote:On the OSA-AKM vs. Roland 3 comparison: Mobility, amphibious capabilities and missile firing speed vs. accuracy, armor and missile quantity is a fair trade-off in my opinion. So an increase to OSA levels would be alright for the Roland 3s in my opinion. Also, HE power is not to forget. The OSA can one-shot planes and (most) NATO helicopters, while the Roland is always needing two hits on a plane and struggles against Hinds quite a bit.FoxZz wrote:It's not fair that it gets the availability of systems like Buk and Tor while it's far from their capabilities.
red units do not have to be balanced with blue units.
Red coalition deck have to be balanced with blue coalition decks.
So for this to be enough you would have to show that these two units lead to bad red v blue balance.
And even if that would not apply the Roland 3 has a lot more armor, so you can just ignore this argument if you say that armor is valued as x, which is almost impossible to disprove.
So, no, not even close to "enough".