Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

User avatar
QuickenRed
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 90
Joined: Wed 18 Feb 2015 12:31
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby QuickenRed » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:48

+1 Yugo'd

RIP in peace Crni Bombarderi
Image

User avatar
orcbuster
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12362
Joined: Fri 7 Sep 2012 21:04
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby orcbuster » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:48

Image

A vote for Finland is a vote for STUGs!
Image
Viker for ingen!

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6706
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby molnibalage » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:50

Because are lot more blue nation than red and last DLC was NL, my vote was on Vietnam. All the rest seemed me pointless. Any Middle East nation falls outside any current coalition and is not blue counterpart, while Vietnam partially at least fits with Red Dragons.

Any NSWP or NATO countiry will be mostly carbon copy of already existing nations...

User avatar
orcbuster
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12362
Joined: Fri 7 Sep 2012 21:04
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby orcbuster » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:52

molnibalage wrote:Because are lot more blue nation than red and last DLC was NL, my vote was on Vietnam. All the rest seemed me pointless. Any Middle East nation falls outside any current coalition and is not blue counterpart, while Vietnam partially at least fits with Red Dragons.

Any NSWP or NATO countiry will be mostly carbon copy of already existing nations...


You haven't looked at the Yugo list have you :P
Image
Viker for ingen!

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6706
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby molnibalage » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:52

[DAY]Topspin2005 wrote:Can i vote for a matchmaking feature instead of a new nation? :twisted:
Than i would re-install the game directly ;)

You cannot make matchmaking system for so few players what generally plays with RD. I rather wish to see more stat changes to make viable currently not used units.

Aim time changes for arty.
Distance dependent dispersion for all tube arty, to make usable at least at short distance old arty.

etc.

User avatar
Mitchverr
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 10646
Joined: Sat 24 Mar 2012 18:08
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby Mitchverr » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:52

molnibalage wrote:Because are lot more blue nation than red and last DLC was NL, my vote was on Vietnam. All the rest seemed me pointless. Any Middle East nation falls outside any current coalition and is not blue counterpart, while Vietnam partially at least fits with Red Dragons.

Any NSWP or NATO countiry will be mostly carbon copy of already existing nations...


I thought the same thing, though yugo seems to be a sure winner already this time and does have alot of inbuilt tech, i voted SADF because it was arguably the most unique country in the list for gameplay reasons.
Image

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6706
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby molnibalage » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:52

orcbuster wrote:
molnibalage wrote:Because are lot more blue nation than red and last DLC was NL, my vote was on Vietnam. All the rest seemed me pointless. Any Middle East nation falls outside any current coalition and is not blue counterpart, while Vietnam partially at least fits with Red Dragons.

Any NSWP or NATO countiry will be mostly carbon copy of already existing nations...


You haven't looked at the Yugo list have you :P

I have seen it, YUG is also not excepton. Any NSWP minor will be seriously over modeled comparing to RL...

User avatar
Sir A Harris
Corporal
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri 8 Apr 2016 00:02
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby Sir A Harris » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:54

uhm, why is India a red faction?

It joined the commonwealth of nations in 1947, and if you have a commonwealth battle group, wouldn't India be included in that?
By default then they would have to be Blue

I shall hold my vote until you either correct it, or explain to me why a commonwealth nation would fight the commonwealth
Image

User avatar
Retards '90
Private
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:47
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby Retards '90 » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:56

Everything sounds great except 1 thing.
in my humble opinion Wargame really need more 1vs1 maps instead 10vs10.
why?
*there enough 10vs10maps from last updates that aren't played by ppl at all.
*some game 1vs1 maps are very big so they are successfully set for by 10vs10 servers
*need new maps for ranked 1vs1
*smaller maps are very good for starting players as give them ability to spend less time on supply problems and additional recon. small maps are really the way for new wargamers to stay in game. right now a lot of guys are playing their first battles in asgard etc, sounds not cool, eh?
* game community is small, unfortunately, so filling 10vs10 takes a too much time. small maps can solve this too
*"wooden pc" users prefer small maps too.

User avatar
Mitchverr
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 10646
Joined: Sat 24 Mar 2012 18:08
Contact:

Re: Some news about the Nation pack ... and the future of Wargame

Postby Mitchverr » Tue 14 Jun 2016 13:56

Sir A Harris wrote:uhm, why is India a red faction?

It joined the commonwealth of nations in 1947, and if you have a commonwealth battle group, wouldn't India be included in that?
By default then they would have to be Blue

I shall hold my vote until you either correct it, or explain to me why a commonwealth nation would fight the commonwealth


Strong ties with Russia, but they also hated and went into wars with China, it makes it a tough choice.
Image

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests