Proposal: f117 availability

User avatar
another505
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13128
Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
Location: Hiatus
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby another505 » Wed 22 Jun 2016 17:02

if F-15e gets mraam , 50 ecm, and 2 per card

i want su27m get 2 per card too



(no, f15e, stays one per card, with 2 cards. 50 ecm, no damn mraam)
Image
Of Salt

captaincarnage
Major
Posts: 1915
Joined: Sat 29 Mar 2014 23:50
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby captaincarnage » Wed 22 Jun 2016 17:07

2 per card deagle or noobhawk is possibly overkill, possibly not in the case of the nighthawk, just FYI OP it is 2 cards of 1 in ALB.

There's actually an easy win for USA's iron bomber issue which is to tighten the bomb spread of the F111E give it say 15% accuracy and the same bombdrop pattern as the deagle and you've got something which will cover a decent area, admittedly not do massive damage but it would still be a useful card IMO
I hope your buratino's die screaming.

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6706
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby molnibalage » Wed 22 Jun 2016 17:11

captaincarnage wrote:2 per card deagle or noobhawk is possibly overkill, possibly not in the case of the nighthawk, just FYI OP it is 2 cards of 1 in ALB.

There's actually an easy win for USA's iron bomber issue which is to tighten the bomb spread of the F111E give it say 15% accuracy and the same bombdrop pattern as the deagle and you've got something which will cover a decent area, admittedly not do massive damage but it would still be a useful card IMO

In ALB were much weaker ASF on red side as well as high and AD. Two cards of F-117 cost was very, very high in AP.

Steamfunk
Lieutenant
Posts: 1470
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2014 06:19

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Steamfunk » Wed 22 Jun 2016 17:26

In ALB were much weaker ASF on red side as well as high end AD.


Well yeah, but there were a few inaccuracies there (especially loadouts). Also there were cheap Shilkas and Tunguska-M was awesome. NATO AD has always been overbuffed, but at least there was a reason for that ie. Hinds. The main difference is the game isn't balanced around the US/USSR, and minors got all sorts of bonuses.

User avatar
Mike
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12409
Joined: Thu 20 Feb 2014 01:09
Location: Virginia, United States of America
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Mike » Wed 22 Jun 2016 17:35

ALEX8 wrote:I disagree, F117 is highly effective in low point tactical games.


Is
This
A
Joke?

"Tactical" games are irrelevant to balance discussions.
Image
Courtesy of KattiValk

Steamfunk
Lieutenant
Posts: 1470
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2014 06:19

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Steamfunk » Wed 22 Jun 2016 17:52

To clarify, I was referring to the fact that RD is balanced around coalitions, which explains why the RAF has an LGB carrier. Or why the Dutch have a tactical missile which in fact belongs to the US, etc.

Forimar
Captain
Posts: 1522
Joined: Mon 6 May 2013 01:27
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Forimar » Wed 22 Jun 2016 18:16

Hell no, the game doesn't need more super bombers. A well played F-117 is obnoxious to deal with, two of them would only make it worse. It would be much better to keep it at one per card and tone down the amount of stealth it loses when it drops its LGBs.

User avatar
Sir Typhoon
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 517
Joined: Sat 30 Jan 2016 13:17
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Sir Typhoon » Wed 22 Jun 2016 20:27

This was been discused some time ago. The solution is simple: 2 cards of NightHawks, and 2 cards of F-15 E. Both with 1 plane each. No need to argue anymore.

User avatar
LoneRifle
Major-General
Posts: 3569
Joined: Wed 3 Jul 2013 17:11
Location: Cackalacky
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby LoneRifle » Wed 22 Jun 2016 21:02

+1
It's time to make America great again folks. Starting with the F117!

:lol:
Image

antred
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue 19 Jan 2016 19:03
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby antred » Wed 22 Jun 2016 21:13

GARGEAN wrote:-1
We don't need more "erase unit" buttons.


This. -1 to this proposal.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sireyn and 73 guests