Proposal: f117 availability

codextero
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat 13 Dec 2014 02:52
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby codextero » Wed 22 Jun 2016 05:17

yeppers wrote:
RoadkillRodger wrote:The closest comparison in game is the GR7. The harrier carries the same payload, and costs 120 points while coming at 2/card. It does not get stealth, but it does get 40 ecm and decent multirole ability

The nighthawk costs more, has no multirole ability, and comes at only 1/card. I think this should be changed to 2/card (like it was in ALB iirc).

No, stealth planes are annoying.


Not annoying because AA don't lose air detection even if the radar weapon is turned off.

Keep a buk close by, it will detect the Nighthawk before it gets into max missile range. Turn BUK on, collect easy kills against 150 pts/0 ECM.

Also there are many exceptional air detection fighters with > 180 s endurance now. Bring one in, no worrying about Nighthawks for 3 minutes.

Sweedish_Gunner wrote:Yeah this. NORAD and Sovkor can burn and we get 2 F-117's and B-5 per card.


Is NORAD all that meta now? I don't see it being used in competitive.

User avatar
Greyhound
Sergeant Major of the Army
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun 9 Aug 2015 16:47
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Greyhound » Wed 22 Jun 2016 06:49

Yeah, the Nighthawk should be 2 per card.
yeppers wrote:
RoadkillRodger wrote:The closest comparison in game is the GR7. The harrier carries the same payload, and costs 120 points while coming at 2/card. It does not get stealth, but it does get 40 ecm and decent multirole ability

The nighthawk costs more, has no multirole ability, and comes at only 1/card. I think this should be changed to 2/card (like it was in ALB iirc).

No, stealth planes are annoying.

It has 0% ECM. That means it is basicly dead when you fly over AA.
Image

urogard
Brigadier
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun 4 May 2014 13:31
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby urogard » Wed 22 Jun 2016 09:33

+1

If F-117 comes at 2 per card, I might even consider adding them back into my decks, I don't even remember the last time I used one.

Considering the LGB targeting bug where the LGB's miss by several km's oder don't even explode at all when hitting the ground already make the F-117 a huge liability and unreliable unit. (Fixing the bug is also welcome)

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Razzmann » Wed 22 Jun 2016 09:46

-1

User avatar
F-22
Lieutenant
Posts: 1225
Joined: Thu 30 May 2013 03:13
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby F-22 » Wed 22 Jun 2016 09:55

As an avid ALB PACT minor player and somebody who consistently hated the nighthawk during ALB, i'ma have to say no to that one dawg. :lol:

I'll only compromise if Yugoslavia is added, then you can send as many black bombers as you want.

Lord Helmchen
Major-General
Posts: 3887
Joined: Tue 5 Mar 2013 00:23
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Lord Helmchen » Wed 22 Jun 2016 10:20

Razzmann wrote:-1

Shhh, soon you'll be able to shoot down all the Crni Bombarder. :mrgreen:
Image

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Razzmann » Wed 22 Jun 2016 10:24

Lord Helmchen wrote:
Razzmann wrote:-1

Shhh, soon you'll be able to shoot down all the Crni Bombarder. :mrgreen:

That is the best argument for it I have heard so far :lol:

User avatar
RoadkillRodger
Lieutenant
Posts: 1148
Joined: Fri 9 May 2014 07:24
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby RoadkillRodger » Wed 22 Jun 2016 10:37

Razzmann wrote:
Lord Helmchen wrote:
Razzmann wrote:-1

Shhh, soon you'll be able to shoot down all the Crni Bombarder. :mrgreen:

That is the best argument for it I have heard so far :lol:


So... +1? :D

User avatar
Greyhound
Sergeant Major of the Army
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun 9 Aug 2015 16:47
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby Greyhound » Wed 22 Jun 2016 11:06

RoadkillRodger wrote:
Razzmann wrote:That is the best argument for it I have heard so far :lol:


So... +1? :D

-1 + 1 is still 0
Image

User avatar
molnibalage
General
Posts: 6708
Joined: Thu 1 Aug 2013 22:54
Location: Hungary
Contact:

Re: Proposal: f117 availability

Postby molnibalage » Wed 22 Jun 2016 11:35

Up to 2 v 2 games won't be an issue but above that? Hm.... Lots of stealh F-117 can eradicate lots of AD units before they can kill any of incoming F-117. In 4v4 and above that cooridnated F-117 spam may can problematic.

I rather wish to see two cards of F-15E with AIM-120. If MiG-29M can be 2/card (yes, with crap AG loadout CBU bombs also should be changed) I cannot see any reason why cannot we have 2/card F-15E. It would have same strike firepower what F-111C has. Yes, it is not prototype but wish so low AP BLEUFOR deck is literally dead now.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests

cron