MG rebalance complete list

User avatar
QUAD
Colonel
Posts: 2766
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013 21:17
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby QUAD » Thu 6 Oct 2016 04:12

Bullfrog wrote:Is the only difference between 75 and 90s inf unit their AT now?


no
Mobile Units Operational :!:

codextero
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat 13 Dec 2014 02:52
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby codextero » Thu 6 Oct 2016 04:16

Bullfrog wrote:Is the only difference between 75 and 90s inf unit their AT now?


Fusiliers and Diggers get better machine guns, Rovavit actually gets a worse machine gun in the MAG vs FALO.

Kasrkin229
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 598
Joined: Thu 20 Feb 2014 06:31
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby Kasrkin229 » Thu 6 Oct 2016 04:32

So Fusilers 90' are the new Turbo Jagers?

And M60 still a shite
Last edited by Kasrkin229 on Thu 6 Oct 2016 04:38, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Tactical Fister in-game

User avatar
Bullfrog
General
Posts: 5308
Joined: Sat 11 Aug 2012 23:48
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby Bullfrog » Thu 6 Oct 2016 04:36

codextero wrote:
Bullfrog wrote:Is the only difference between 75 and 90s inf unit their AT now?


Fusiliers and Diggers get better machine guns, Rovavit actually gets a worse machine gun in the MAG vs FALO.


Sorry I worded my question poorly. I mean are there hidden stats that are different from MG to MG? The Marines 75 and 90 units for example... They have drastically different guns yet their MG stats are the same on the stat card. Should I take that for face value and say Marines 75 and 90 are the same unit sort AT and cost or is a box fed MG going to perform different than a belt fed one.
Does not affiliate with members who post in #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
Image

User avatar
Killertomato
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby Killertomato » Thu 6 Oct 2016 05:07

Kasrkin229 wrote:So Fusilers 90' are the new Turbo Jagers?

And M60 still a shite


I think they're better. LAW-80 and all...
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?

R3d Sh4mbala
Sergeant Major
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu 12 May 2016 06:17
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby R3d Sh4mbala » Thu 6 Oct 2016 06:44

Any word on the PKM?

I noticed it seems to stun way faster than normal pre-patch.

User avatar
Admiral Piett
Colonel
Posts: 2910
Joined: Sun 12 Feb 2012 22:04
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby Admiral Piett » Thu 6 Oct 2016 06:49

R3d Sh4mbala wrote:Any word on the PKM?

I noticed it seems to stun way faster than normal pre-patch.


All those bad line infantry MGs were standardized, so horrible stuff like the PKM, M60, Type 67 and 62 Shiki should preform a bit better. They still aren't great, but they aren't as bad as they were before.

R3d Sh4mbala
Sergeant Major
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu 12 May 2016 06:17
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby R3d Sh4mbala » Thu 6 Oct 2016 06:55

Admiral Piett wrote:
R3d Sh4mbala wrote:Any word on the PKM?

I noticed it seems to stun way faster than normal pre-patch.


All those bad line infantry MGs were standardized, so horrible stuff like the PKM, M60, Type 67 and 62 Shiki should preform a bit better. They still aren't great, but they aren't as bad as they were before.

The reason I asked is because I was using Aukflarer Kommandos and it seems to be doing alot better than normal PKM.

Although I did ask around about its original ranges it has had.

Would the PKM be affected by the Training? :?

User avatar
QUAD
Colonel
Posts: 2766
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013 21:17
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby QUAD » Thu 6 Oct 2016 07:05

R3d Sh4mbala wrote:
Admiral Piett wrote:
R3d Sh4mbala wrote:Any word on the PKM?

I noticed it seems to stun way faster than normal pre-patch.


All those bad line infantry MGs were standardized, so horrible stuff like the PKM, M60, Type 67 and 62 Shiki should preform a bit better. They still aren't great, but they aren't as bad as they were before.

The reason I asked is because I was using Aukflarer Kommandos and it seems to be doing alot better than normal PKM.

Although I did ask around about its original ranges it has had.

Would the PKM be affected by the Training? :?


Training level effects MG power, except for Special Forces that use the MG3. (Theirs is at Shock level.)
Mobile Units Operational :!:

User avatar
wargamer1985
Brigadier
Posts: 3305
Joined: Sat 4 May 2013 00:36
Contact:

Re: MG rebalance complete list

Postby wargamer1985 » Thu 6 Oct 2016 07:17

QUAD wrote:
R3d Sh4mbala wrote:
Admiral Piett wrote:
All those bad line infantry MGs were standardized, so horrible stuff like the PKM, M60, Type 67 and 62 Shiki should preform a bit better. They still aren't great, but they aren't as bad as they were before.

The reason I asked is because I was using Aukflarer Kommandos and it seems to be doing alot better than normal PKM.

Although I did ask around about its original ranges it has had.

Would the PKM be affected by the Training? :?


Training level effects MG power, except for Special Forces that use the MG3. (Theirs is at Shock level.)

And it should stay at that, the MG-3 deserves at least on disadvantage and having lower accuracy for 'em is fine.
APPLY TO THE GLORIOUS CULT OF THE WARHAWK! LIBERATING NAZIS SINCE 1939!
Image

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests

cron