Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

User avatar
Zero_Ecm
Sergeant
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue 15 Nov 2016 06:39
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby Zero_Ecm » Sat 10 Dec 2016 23:40

New DLCs CV inf can into helo transporn in armored, mech and support.

User avatar
Greyhound
Sergeant Major of the Army
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun 9 Aug 2015 16:47
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby Greyhound » Sun 11 Dec 2016 00:15

Israeli Chaparral (Drakon) has somehow magicly gained two more missiles on the model. :lol: As far as I know there are no Chaparrals that can hold 6 missiles (feel free to correct me). The unit has to reload after 4 shots so its only a cosmetic thing.
Image

User avatar
Xeno426
Carbon 13
Posts: 11962
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 21:27
Location: Acheron, Hadley's Hope
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby Xeno426 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 04:30

HrcAk47 wrote:Funny how it has 60% probability of first shot hit while moving at 2100 m and only 50% while standing still :roll:

Xeno426 wrote:"above 50% accuracy"
Image
CloakandDagger wrote:And you're one of the people with the shiny colored name. No wonder the game is in the state it's in.

User avatar
nuke92
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 21:51
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby nuke92 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 12:05

M-84 first shot probability of moving tank on moving target at high range is above 70℅ according to FCS manufacturer.


Fcs shown @ 11:30

(this is not a proposal)
Image
"Spike MR is more accurate I'll give you that but Konkurs has more range and isn't prototype" - Warchat™ July 2017
"ALB added planes, RD added ships, WG4 will add Ekranoplans" - Warchat™ August 2017

User avatar
nuke92
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 21:51
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby nuke92 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 13:33

AMX-10RC isn't available to armored decks.
Although it was developed according to French armored doctrines.

AMX-13 should go up to it's irl 19 rpm.
Image
"Spike MR is more accurate I'll give you that but Konkurs has more range and isn't prototype" - Warchat™ July 2017
"ALB added planes, RD added ships, WG4 will add Ekranoplans" - Warchat™ August 2017

User avatar
Xeno426
Carbon 13
Posts: 11962
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 21:27
Location: Acheron, Hadley's Hope
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby Xeno426 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 17:53

nuke92 wrote:M-84 first shot probability of moving tank on moving target at high range is above 70℅ according to FCS manufacturer.

And how does that compare to other tanks in the game? Keep in mind LeClerc had 90% hit probability at 2400m, and the M1A2 had 97% at 2000m, and these values are obviously not copy-pasted right into the game. Thus the M-84 wouldn't have 70% copy-pasted right into the game either.
Image
CloakandDagger wrote:And you're one of the people with the shiny colored name. No wonder the game is in the state it's in.

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby HrcAk47 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 18:42

Xeno426 wrote:
nuke92 wrote:M-84 first shot probability of moving tank on moving target at high range is above 70℅ according to FCS manufacturer.

And how does that compare to other tanks in the game? Keep in mind LeClerc had 90% hit probability at 2400m, and the M1A2 had 97% at 2000m, and these values are obviously not copy-pasted right into the game. Thus the M-84 wouldn't have 70% copy-pasted right into the game either.


[citation needed]
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

Sleksa
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2265
Joined: Tue 14 May 2013 12:26
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby Sleksa » Sun 11 Dec 2016 18:55

HrcAk47 wrote:
Xeno426 wrote:
nuke92 wrote:M-84 first shot probability of moving tank on moving target at high range is above 70℅ according to FCS manufacturer.

And how does that compare to other tanks in the game? Keep in mind LeClerc had 90% hit probability at 2400m, and the M1A2 had 97% at 2000m, and these values are obviously not copy-pasted right into the game. Thus the M-84 wouldn't have 70% copy-pasted right into the game either.


[citation needed]


As far as leclerc goes:

http://www.safran-electronics-defense.com/file/download/d1497e_savan15.pdf


Page 2:

Image

This is straight from the manufacturer, and in case it's not reliable enough, the same is also mentioned in the Finnish armor guild's 2008 presentation of the T-72M1 modernization by Col. Dahl who's live-fire tested the system:

Original:
Varteenotettavimmalta vaikuttanut tarjokas oli ranskalaista perua: Ranskan Wärtsilän 950 hv diesel rattiohjaus monisädevaihteisto, täysin uusi GIATin 120mm tykki ja Sagem Savan 15 ammunnanhallinta, joka saavuttaa 2400 m etäisyydeltä 90% osumatarkkuuden.


Translated:

The most interesting proposal was french: French Wärtsilä's 950hp Diesel steering wheel control, multi layer transmission, completely new GIAT 120mm cannon and Sagem's Savan 15 fire control system, which acheives 90% accuracy at 2400m
Image

User avatar
nuke92
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 21:51
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby nuke92 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 19:14

Yes and three axis stabilization with fire gating makes quite a difference compared to say T-80U.
Keep in mind this is vanilla M-84.
Image
"Spike MR is more accurate I'll give you that but Konkurs has more range and isn't prototype" - Warchat™ July 2017
"ALB added planes, RD added ships, WG4 will add Ekranoplans" - Warchat™ August 2017

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Bug/Inconsistency Thread.

Postby HrcAk47 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 20:04

Nice find.

Funny how M-84 has all of these features, sans thermals, CCD camera and GPS.
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests