Page 94 of 94

Re: Should more than just 2 new nations be added to REDFOR?

Posted: Tue 15 Nov 2016 21:43
by HrcAk47
SIPRI register sucks bad regarding Yugoslavia. So many things we never even considered looking at.

Also, it classified almost all of our homemade stuff as import, which is highly incorrect.

Shilkas, Osas, Buk M1s, BMP-1s, BTR-40s, BTR-60Ps and PBs, D-20s, T-72M1s, MiG-15s (we, however, had exported one to the US :D ) Sidewinders, and many, many more.

Re: Should more than just 2 new nations be added to REDFOR?

Posted: Tue 15 Nov 2016 22:08
by Bougnas
antizombies_boy wrote:
Bougnas wrote:Don't forget that SIPRI only lists weapons sales, not local upgrades/production (unless licensed).

For example greek Mercedes Benz 462 aren't seen anywhere in SIPRI.


Where can I see the SIPRIs list?



There is some nice stuff from 1950 to 1995 about Italy and Spain, especially actual intro dates for specific variants as well as designations, for example for helicopters and TOW variants.

Re: Should more than just 2 new nations be added to REDFOR?

Posted: Wed 16 Nov 2016 14:39
by antizombies_boy
Bougnas wrote:
antizombies_boy wrote:
Bougnas wrote:Don't forget that SIPRI only lists weapons sales, not local upgrades/production (unless licensed).

For example greek Mercedes Benz 462 aren't seen anywhere in SIPRI.


Where can I see the SIPRIs list?



There is some nice stuff from 1950 to 1995 about Italy and Spain, especially actual intro dates for specific variants as well as designations, for example for helicopters and TOW variants.


I've been looking the SIPRI list and there are a lot of interesting information, but there are some information omitted too. For example doesn't appear 4 BMR-600 amphibian (Like BMR-600 form Peru Marine Forces) sold by Spain to USA to make landing sea test in 1991, and it's only one example.

And ALL NEWS!!!!: http://www.eugensystems.com/a-preview-into-yugoslavia/