Crowarior wrote:Any idea on yugo release date ?
Probably more info on the two streams, but no confirmed date yet as far as I know.
Crowarior wrote:Any idea on yugo release date ?
Vulcan 607 wrote:Those pistols look like p99s
CRASHER47 wrote:Vulcan 607 wrote:Those pistols look like p99s
they all look like Glocks for me![]()
Darkstar387 wrote:If they make WG4, I suspect they'll use a new engine and bump up the time frame to something more recent like 2000 - 2015. They'll most likely drop all the antiquated equipment. This would obviously make for a smaller unit roster but allow them to cram more nations in without having to balance 1700+ units.
TankHunter wrote:Add the Ukraine and call it Burning Seas, with Turkey, Greece and Ukraine(obviously as a location and not an independent nation) being the Adriatic/Black Sea front. I remember a NATO landing at either Crimea or Odessa as an event in a WALB campaign that would draw away reinforcements or cause some other negative effect on REDFOR(depending on if you let the unit leave or not. IIRC it gets repelled if you let the brigade leave, or you lose Victory Points/enemy gains Victory Points towards winning the campaign if you keep the brigade)
antizombies_boy wrote:TankHunter wrote:Add the Ukraine and call it Burning Seas, with Turkey, Greece and Ukraine(obviously as a location and not an independent nation) being the Adriatic/Black Sea front. I remember a NATO landing at either Crimea or Odessa as an event in a WALB campaign that would draw away reinforcements or cause some other negative effect on REDFOR(depending on if you let the unit leave or not. IIRC it gets repelled if you let the brigade leave, or you lose Victory Points/enemy gains Victory Points towards winning the campaign if you keep the brigade)
It could be great, but... currently Ukraine belongs to URSS in Wargame Enviroment. I don't know what the forum thinks about the idea of separate Ukraine and URSS in Wargame like 2 differents "nations".
antizombies_boy wrote:TankHunter wrote:Add the Ukraine and call it Burning Seas, with Turkey, Greece and Ukraine(obviously as a location and not an independent nation) being the Adriatic/Black Sea front. I remember a NATO landing at either Crimea or Odessa as an event in a WALB campaign that would draw away reinforcements or cause some other negative effect on REDFOR(depending on if you let the unit leave or not. IIRC it gets repelled if you let the brigade leave, or you lose Victory Points/enemy gains Victory Points towards winning the campaign if you keep the brigade)
It could be great, but... currently Ukraine belongs to URSS in Wargame Enviroment. I don't know what the forum thinks about the idea of separate Ukraine and URSS in Wargame like 2 differents "nations".
Mephistopheles wrote: Adding Greece and Turkey in one coalition is like adding USSR and USA in one coialition....allthough both are nato members they used to shot eachother planes down in the 80s-00s
TankHunter wrote:
I guess reading isn't your strong suit man. I said add Ukraine as a geographic area of battle for maps and campaign, and specifically NOT as an independent nation since it didn't exist as one. Hell I even edited that post to make it clearer that I meant it as a location and not as a nation, IDK how you didn't catch that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests