[DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

User avatar
[EUG]MadMat
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 15340
Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 13:31
Location: Paris, France.
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby [EUG]MadMat » Tue 22 Nov 2016 13:50

thenosh wrote:Any possibility to see split east block coalitions?

No.

Besides, the topic here is the new FINPOL/YUGVAK coaloitions here.
No hijacking thread under my watch.

User avatar
steppewolf
Second-Lieutenant
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon 26 Aug 2013 10:38
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby steppewolf » Tue 22 Nov 2016 13:54

JoonasTo wrote:
HrcAk47 wrote:
nuke92 wrote:Entente 68

...no ideology, nationality or any goofy name involved, short and simple + sounds like a military codename.
Take this please.


+1

Only if we can add Romania to that when it comes :D


I hope for some Finnish votes :D

Romania can be of course grouped with Czechoslovakia, it had strong ties in inter-war period and after '45 prefered to buy from CSSR what they produced under Soviet license. Relations with Yugoslavia are already well known but if we want more REDFOR could work also grouped with Yugo only as YUROM.

User avatar
ToTheMetal
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 347
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2016 20:12
Location: Ironforge
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby ToTheMetal » Tue 22 Nov 2016 13:55

nuke92 wrote:Entente 68

...no ideology, nationality or any goofy name involved, short and simple + sounds like a military codename.
Take this please.

That's probably the best suggestion so far.
steppewolf wrote:BALTIC FRONT

To me it sounds like some kind of retarded modern nationalistic Russian organisation, huh.
Image

User avatar
[EUG]MadMat
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 15340
Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2011 13:31
Location: Paris, France.
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby [EUG]MadMat » Tue 22 Nov 2016 13:58

steppewolf wrote:
nuke92 wrote:Yeah instead of Baltic Alliance it should be Baltic Pact.


Or BALTIC FRONT since there wasn't a Pact, Finland wasn't part of the WP but just one to side with REDFOR so FRONT makes more sense, sounds Red and like a war time only alliance.

BALTIC FRONT was indeed our first idea, but it sounded too much like WW2 Soviet "fronts" for "army groups".
Would it fit anyway in our case? That would be the best choice IMO if it did ...

User avatar
ElBubba
Warrant Officer
Posts: 415
Joined: Sat 6 Oct 2012 18:15
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby ElBubba » Tue 22 Nov 2016 14:00

Coalition of the Failed States
The Split Ups
Spoiler : :
It`s a joke!
Image

User avatar
dumbaos
Sergeant
Posts: 67
Joined: Tue 22 Oct 2013 18:39
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby dumbaos » Tue 22 Nov 2016 14:02

+1 for Entente 68, sounds cool and is rooted in history.

User avatar
damoj
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 322
Joined: Mon 26 Sep 2016 10:07
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby damoj » Tue 22 Nov 2016 14:03

ElBubba wrote:Coalition of the Failed States
The Split Ups
Spoiler : :
It`s a joke!


изазвати

User avatar
JoonasTo
Master Sergeant
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu 17 Nov 2016 21:30
Location: Somewhere in the Finnish woodlands
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby JoonasTo » Tue 22 Nov 2016 14:05

[EUG]MadMat wrote:
steppewolf wrote:
nuke92 wrote:Yeah instead of Baltic Alliance it should be Baltic Pact.


Or BALTIC FRONT since there wasn't a Pact, Finland wasn't part of the WP but just one to side with REDFOR so FRONT makes more sense, sounds Red and like a war time only alliance.

BALTIC FRONT was indeed our first idea, but it sounded too much like WW2 Soviet "fronts" for "army groups".
Would it fit anyway in our case? That would be the best choice IMO if it did ...

Depends on your story in the game. If Finnish and Polish militaries have been integrated into the USSR military then yes.
If they are still independent, there will be a huge cringe factor, seeing as both nations kinda hated the USSR.

Plus Baltic Front would, at least in my eyes, also encompass the Baltic states that were part of USSR at the time. So why no USSR as part of the front?

Besides, Baltic alliance fighting for freedom from USSR oppression is too good to pass by, am I right? :D
The psychotic Finnish wood-elf

User avatar
steppewolf
Second-Lieutenant
Posts: 920
Joined: Mon 26 Aug 2013 10:38
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby steppewolf » Tue 22 Nov 2016 14:06

[EUG]MadMat wrote:
steppewolf wrote:
nuke92 wrote:Yeah instead of Baltic Alliance it should be Baltic Pact.


Or BALTIC FRONT since there wasn't a Pact, Finland wasn't part of the WP but just one to side with REDFOR so FRONT makes more sense, sounds Red and like a war time only alliance.

BALTIC FRONT was indeed our first idea, but it sounded too much like WW2 Soviet "fronts" for "army groups".
Would it fit anyway in our case? That would be the best choice IMO if it did ...


It was my choice of word because reflect the what if situation of WG:
- a rather provisional/casual cooperation than "pact" or "block"
- sounds communist/redfor compared with "alliance"

User avatar
damoj
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 322
Joined: Mon 26 Sep 2016 10:07
Contact:

Re: [DOUBLE NATION PACK: REDS] On new coalitions ...

Postby damoj » Tue 22 Nov 2016 14:08

nuke92 wrote:Entente 68

...no ideology, nationality or any goofy name involved, short and simple + sounds like a military codename.
Take this please.


It sounds nice but... why?

Yugoslavia wasn't exactly a fan of the suppression of the Prague Spring, "68" has a weird connotation to it.
Perhaps Мала Антанта/Little Entente would be better if the community were that keen on "Entente".

Hell... combine it with my original suggestion. "Pan-Slavic Entente" has a nice ring to it.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests