NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

urogard
Brigadier
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun 4 May 2014 13:31
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby urogard » Fri 25 Nov 2016 15:59

nuke92 wrote:
Sweedish_Gunner wrote:Stats should be slighty nerfed, price decreased, availability decreased.

What I don't get is why they have the same super upgraded version as the Poles.


So availability even more decreased...
That would be a grand total of one (1)...

I don't think he understands that it already is only 2 per card

That or he was just ranting arbitrarily

User avatar
HardlyCriket
Sergeant Major
Posts: 270
Joined: Fri 21 Jun 2013 17:51
Location: The true North, cold and polite.
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby HardlyCriket » Fri 25 Nov 2016 16:19

Honestly, it looks like you're paying 30 points to not have to click a button when the enemy planes come in.
Image >Special thanks to kiheerSEDMAN for the sig.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfZeIYyL_Gw

User avatar
another505
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13128
Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
Location: Hiatus
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby another505 » Fri 25 Nov 2016 16:46

Just make it a EOTS HAWK's range and accuracy and price it 85pts and i will still use it.

pls eugen, lower down the number of super weapon toys....
Image
Of Salt

User avatar
Keinutnai
Lieutenant
Posts: 1115
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2012 16:02
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby Keinutnai » Fri 25 Nov 2016 16:56

nuke92 wrote:
Sweedish_Gunner wrote:Stats should be slighty nerfed, price decreased, availability decreased.

What I don't get is why they have the same super upgraded version as the Poles.


So availability even more decreased...
That would be a grand total of one (1)...

Why not decrease availabilty to 0 while we are at it.

Patriot is clearly much better than newa and here is why: why its large range and high accuracy coupled with weaker ecm of redfor planes it performs much better than newa ever will.

Newa needs a price buff. Sure non radar is an advantage, but turning patriot off is also possible and the advantages of patriot outweigh the radar ability. We really need more of them per card and they should cost no more than 105 points
Wargame 4 - Balkan at War - New Countries: Italy, Spain, Greece & Turkey versus Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Hungary & Romania!

User avatar
remilia019
Second-Lieutenant
Posts: 899
Joined: Tue 6 Jan 2015 09:04
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby remilia019 » Fri 25 Nov 2016 17:01

Decent enough to me, but will be a pain to babysit, it'll be good because it relieves you of the Radar Micro Shenaningans, but on the other hand you'll be spending 120pts for something a 75pts unit can do equally.

You can spread other cheaper AAs around and the plus of this unit is, since its not radar, you don't need it to sit at the back, just put it right behind your tanks! further AA coverage on the front lines is always good.

really we'll have to see, we may be seeing Yugoslavia implementing a no-fly zone into Red's borders or we might also see Yugoslavia's AA net wouldn't really hold enough area.

The most important thing in either case is that you can deter the enemy from sending their planes at you, since Blue usually is so good at gaining Air Superiority.
Image

Steamfunk
Lieutenant
Posts: 1470
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2014 06:19

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby Steamfunk » Fri 25 Nov 2016 17:21

Not happy with any of these units, but this is what happens when you introduce paid DLC.

User avatar
orcbuster
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 12362
Joined: Fri 7 Sep 2012 21:04
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby orcbuster » Fri 25 Nov 2016 17:38

another505 wrote:Just make it a EOTS HAWK's range and accuracy and price it 85pts and i will still use it.

pls eugen, lower down the number of super weapon toys....


This
Image
Viker for ingen!

urogard
Brigadier
Posts: 3062
Joined: Sun 4 May 2014 13:31
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby urogard » Fri 25 Nov 2016 17:53

orcbuster wrote:
another505 wrote:Just make it a EOTS HAWK's range and accuracy and price it 85pts and i will still use it.

pls eugen, lower down the number of super weapon toys....


This

most importantly give it same availability

User avatar
steppewolf
Second-Lieutenant
Posts: 972
Joined: Mon 26 Aug 2013 10:38
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby steppewolf » Fri 25 Nov 2016 18:01

Super weapons alone doesn't change the outcome, people do, that's why Maglan was a big mistake.

That Neva is far of a super weapon...

User avatar
JohnDaBarr
Sergeant
Posts: 70
Joined: Sat 23 Jan 2016 14:51
Location: Croatia
Contact:

Re: NEVA M1T (Non-radar) Your opinion?

Postby JohnDaBarr » Fri 25 Nov 2016 18:07

urogard wrote:
orcbuster wrote:
another505 wrote:Just make it a EOTS HAWK's range and accuracy and price it 85pts and i will still use it.

pls eugen, lower down the number of super weapon toys....


This

most importantly give it same availability


And then the other half of the community would flip their shit because ''Eugen gave us a bland copy, don't they have some imagination?''
This way is more interesting, and IF the units proves to be too OP (and I really doubt that) it will get a nerf and all will be fine.
Don't fight a battle if you don't gain anything by winning.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests

cron