The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

User avatar
CornProducts
Colonel
Posts: 2959
Joined: Mon 7 Apr 2014 06:48
Contact:

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby CornProducts » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:00

Guggy wrote:You both make good points. Have you considered using S-24 engines to boost the RPG's?

Agreed with Mako regarding pen btw.

Teach me your ways oh great one. This shit is too funny. :lol:
Image

User avatar
Sgt._Pepper
Lieutenant
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sat 15 Jun 2013 10:57
Location: South Tyrol, Italy
Contact:

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby Sgt._Pepper » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:00

morpher wrote:
Sgt._Pepper wrote:What do you mean? VDV '90 have the same range as VDV and cost 5 points more.


That's tricky because the AP of base vdv is not that of a base shock.

Check israel airborne and chinese marines '90. The range is free.


Should they cost +10 points instead of +5 because of the range?

Also Lu Zhandui also don't have base shock AP. They are a stat copy of Mot.-Schützen(except for MG ammo consumption) and should actually cost 15 points, so LZ '90 actually cost 10 points more than the base version(I mean they don't, but you get what I mean).
Image

User avatar
Mako
General
Posts: 7352
Joined: Sun 5 May 2013 20:00
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby Mako » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:00

morpher wrote:
Mako wrote:The point is Jager, the most well known base inf needed an amazing MG and a decent launcher to become 15 pts.


They are not good anymore. They disappeared. 16AP is no more the magic values, with all the 3AV transports around. And the MG rebalance made the gap with the MG3 smaller.



They're still known.

Known doesn't mean good.
If there's two kinds of players, those that like challenges and those that want a fair game, pubstomps should make everyone happy.

User avatar
morpher
Major-General
Posts: 3975
Joined: Sun 17 May 2015 21:03

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby morpher » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:02

Sgt._Pepper wrote:Should they cost +10 points instead of +5 because of the range?


I am just pointing out the range is priced inconsistently. Nothing more.

User avatar
morpher
Major-General
Posts: 3975
Joined: Sun 17 May 2015 21:03

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby morpher » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:03

Mako wrote:They're still known.

Known doesn't mean good.


What do you mean with "known"?

User avatar
morpher
Major-General
Posts: 3975
Joined: Sun 17 May 2015 21:03

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby morpher » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:05

Sweedish_Gunner wrote:It was more of a prediction. You weren't quoted so you had to click on the topic yourself. ;)


You don't click on new topics?

User avatar
Mako
General
Posts: 7352
Joined: Sun 5 May 2013 20:00
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby Mako » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:08

Morpher, learn how to edit your posts man.

Anyways, known, known of, known about.
If there's two kinds of players, those that like challenges and those that want a fair game, pubstomps should make everyone happy.

User avatar
morpher
Major-General
Posts: 3975
Joined: Sun 17 May 2015 21:03

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby morpher » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:10

Mako wrote:Morpher, learn how to edit your posts man.

Anyways, known, known of, known about.


You said an amazing MG and a decent AT. I said they are not good because the MG is no more amazing and the AT is not decent. For 15pt.

User avatar
another505
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13128
Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
Location: Hiatus
Contact:

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby another505 » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:22

and Jager would be broken as 10pts.
Im thankful that it has been nerfed to 15pts.

As its AP being 16 no longer as good. 2AV is still the majority of transports/apc. Only IFV has really gotten more than 2.


I am quite fine with Mako's idea. Though I am quite afraid of motshutzen 75 getting even stronger, i would leave it to 15AP.

I think RPG-7VL that is used by the marines which no ones uses (poor redfor marines... other than luzhandui90) could be buffed to 20AP.
Image
Of Salt

User avatar
Narcissistic Black
Major
Posts: 1892
Joined: Tue 14 Jan 2014 01:58
Contact:

Re: The RPG-7 is under-modeled. RPG-7 STRONK

Postby Narcissistic Black » Mon 28 Nov 2016 03:32

Im pretty sure Motoschuten are 15 points because they have 14AP on their launchers not because of Venomous disgusting filthy word "FLAVOR". which only gives them mainly one 1 effective job, Killing infantry as 14AP isnt really doing much.

Motoschutzen 90s are 20 because yes they're the next version of motoschutzen but also because their launcher isn't amazing enough to make them 25Ppoints as it lacks range. even though it has great AP. If they had something like RPG-29 or RPG-26 they would be 25.

Another thing is I'm pretty sure 700m is base range you dont pay more for it. you either pay less for 525 or you pay more for 825.


EDIT: to actaully add something to topic. I hope you're not asking for buffs on an already over represented compaired to IRL capablilties faction. Unless its only USSR. then in that case acceptable.
The First Narcissist
Image
Click signature to see Modification, Alpha Released. Try now.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests