Eugen should take a look at tank acc

User avatar
Vestly
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun 24 Mar 2013 14:19
Contact:

Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby Vestly » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:12

1979 Leopard 2 which doesnt have a thermal sight is more accurate, than 1995 tank with thermals, etc. Ok.
Image

User avatar
DasaKamov
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 339
Joined: Wed 17 Apr 2013 18:03
Location: United States of Denial
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby DasaKamov » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:21

There's already a thread about the Moderna:

viewtopic.php?f=155&t=58936&start=10
"Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." - George Bernard Shaw

User avatar
Vestly
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun 24 Mar 2013 14:19
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby Vestly » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:21

Yea, i know, but this isnt only about Moderna.

edit: more redfor tanks, especially the later ones, could get 60% acc
Last edited by Vestly on Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:24, edited 1 time in total.

throwaway
Lieutenant
Posts: 1262
Joined: Fri 27 Feb 2015 21:23
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby throwaway » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:22

just make everything 70% and lets be done with it

User avatar
Mako
General
Posts: 7352
Joined: Sun 5 May 2013 20:00
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby Mako » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:23

Does the Moderna have thermal sights?
If there's two kinds of players, those that like challenges and those that want a fair game, pubstomps should make everyone happy.

User avatar
Killertomato
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby Killertomato » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:24

Why should the M1 and M1IP have 2100m when soviet tanks with inferior FCSs and no thermals shoot 2275?
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?

User avatar
Vestly
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun 24 Mar 2013 14:19
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby Vestly » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:25

Killertomato wrote:Why should the M1 and M1IP have 2100m when soviet tanks with inferior FCSs and no thermals shoot 2275?

I am up for buffing them as well. As soon as more redfor tanks get 60+% acc.

User avatar
Killertomato
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby Killertomato » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:27

Vestly wrote:
Killertomato wrote:Why should the M1 and M1IP have 2100m when soviet tanks with inferior FCSs and no thermals shoot 2275?

I am up for buffing them as well. As soon as more redfor tanks get 60+% acc.


More redfor tanks like what?
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?

User avatar
Mako
General
Posts: 7352
Joined: Sun 5 May 2013 20:00
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby Mako » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:30

Vestly wrote:
Killertomato wrote:Why should the M1 and M1IP have 2100m when soviet tanks with inferior FCSs and no thermals shoot 2275?

I am up for buffing them as well. As soon as more redfor tanks get 60+% acc.


Redfor tanks were less accurate IRL bud.
If there's two kinds of players, those that like challenges and those that want a fair game, pubstomps should make everyone happy.

GARGEAN
Brigadier
Posts: 3496
Joined: Wed 9 Apr 2014 14:19
Contact:

Re: Eugen should take a look at tank acc

Postby GARGEAN » Sat 3 Dec 2016 23:33

Killertomato wrote:Why should the M1 and M1IP have 2100m when soviet tanks with inferior FCSs and no thermals shoot 2275?

Why should T-64B have 2100 range and 90% of soviet tanks have 55 or less acc if M60A1 with no FCS and coincidence rangefinder have 2275 and 60%?
Mako wrote:Redfor tanks were less accurate IRL bud.

Say this to all 1A33 or better equipped tanks in comparison with ERA, Leo 1A4 ect.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 15 guests