About the 2 New Mig-29

[urogard]

IMHO as long as FIN has the USA equv. F-18 ASF MiG-29 maybe should not be ASF with BVR capability. Can be similar to USSR MiG-29S. With 2+2 R-77+R-73 it would be superior comparing even to Mirage-2000C which suffers from 4+5HE AAM issue.

I think you mixed up something there
USSR MiG-29S has iron bombs

No, just some words are missing. I think it should be iron bomber. Somebody suggested 2xR-77 + 2xR-77. This is where I mentioned M2k.

tbh i'm not really sure what good is the MiG-29S with those iron bombs

[molnibalage]

tbh i'm not really sure what good is the MiG-29S with those iron bombs

The high ECM. MiG-29S is a better Tornado IDS.

[urogard]

tbh i'm not really sure what good is the MiG-29S with those iron bombs

The high ECM. MiG-29S is a better Tornado IDS.

Ok, I don't believe in ECM on bombers because RNG hates me, I have to deal with that differently so to me that stat matters very little when building my decks.

although I meant with my question was what good is the MiG-29S as opposed to other USSR options. Why should I take the MiG-29S over another bomber.

[molnibalage]

tbh i'm not really sure what good is the MiG-29S with those iron bombs

The high ECM. MiG-29S is a better Tornado IDS.

Ok, I don't believe in ECM on bombers because RNG hates me, I have to deal with that differently so to me that stat matters very little when building my decks.

although I meant with my question was what good is the MiG-29S as opposed to other USSR options. Why should I take the MiG-29S over another bomber.

If you play FIN deck who cares about what USSR has...?

[urogard]

If you play FIN deck who cares about what USSR has...?

You kinda mentioned it first, then i went from there

[molnibalage]

If you play FIN deck who cares about what USSR has...?

You kinda mentioned it first, then i went from there

I brought as an example. Even for USSR deck a classic ASF is used as bomber...