Xeno426 wrote:FrangibleCover wrote:Be fair, that's pretty damn innovative. Nobody had done anything like it previously.Spoiler : :Spoiler : :
First is dumb fired, second has unique guiding system.
Xeno426 wrote:FrangibleCover wrote:Be fair, that's pretty damn innovative. Nobody had done anything like it previously.Spoiler : :Spoiler : :
CommanderDef wrote:First is dumb fired, second has unique guiding system.
Xeno426 wrote:FrangibleCover wrote:Be fair, that's pretty damn innovative. Nobody had done anything like it previously.
[Nutty Nazi suicide V1s]
FrangibleCover wrote:Xeno426 wrote:FrangibleCover wrote:Be fair, that's pretty damn innovative. Nobody had done anything like it previously.
[Nutty Nazi suicide V1s]
Fair enough, didn't realise they beat the Ohka to test flights by a month if Wiki is to be believed. Still, it never actually entered service and it's a pulsejet, not a solid rocket aircraft. There's some innovation in the Ohka, first solid-rocket powered aircraft I think. One does wonder if they'd been more sensible to just put the explosives on the rocket motors and then sling it under a light bomber to create a proto S-24.
Xeno426 wrote:CommanderDef wrote:First is dumb fired, second has unique guiding system.
Also a unique pilot escape system.
Jump out in front of a ramjet intake.
CommanderDef wrote:[
And I thought that the piloted V-1 was a japenese homemade upgrade, but... did Germans actually use that 'guided' one? Or is it just for test?
Xeno426 wrote:CommanderDef wrote:[
And I thought that the piloted V-1 was a japenese homemade upgrade, but... did Germans actually use that 'guided' one? Or is it just for test?
It was planned to be used, but Hitler was very against the concept of suicide bombing and thus the tactic was for the pilot to fix the aircraft into a dive and lock in the stick, then bail out.
Granted, the aforementioned issue of the ramjet intake being just above his head, along with the likely very high slipstream during the dive and dimensions of the rest of the tail and engine assembly basically meant it was a suicide weapon anyway, but nobody told Hitler that. It never got used, though; the closest to manned use were training in glider versions.
FrangibleCover wrote:It's not a ramjet, it's a pulsejet.
FrangibleCover wrote:The Germans had ejection seats on the Do-335 that kinda-sorta worked (they occasionally pulled your arms off at the shoulder) so it's not that they couldn't have built a pilot escape mechanism that gave the silly bugger a chance, probably ejecting downwards.
FrangibleCover wrote:These things always beg the question though: What were they trying to hit? There are massive unstoppable armies closing on them from all directions, they can't end the war by 'heroically' ploughing a plywood box full of bang into any point target I can think of. I sort of see the Ohka as an anti-ship weapon that, in sufficient numbers, could have disrupted USN tactical airpower over Kyushu in the event of an invasion but what utility would the Fi-103R have against the combined Allied armed forces on land?
molnibalage wrote:IMHO as long as FIN has the USA equv. F-18 ASF MiG-29 maybe should not be ASF with BVR capability. Can be similar to USSR MiG-29S. With 2+2 R-77+R-73 it would be superior comparing even to Mirage-2000C which suffers from 4+5HE AAM issue.
urogard wrote:molnibalage wrote:IMHO as long as FIN has the USA equv. F-18 ASF MiG-29 maybe should not be ASF with BVR capability. Can be similar to USSR MiG-29S. With 2+2 R-77+R-73 it would be superior comparing even to Mirage-2000C which suffers from 4+5HE AAM issue.
I think you mixed up something there
USSR MiG-29S has iron bombs
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests