Nighthawk

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Nighthawk

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:13

Hello, Can we get 2 cards for Nighthawk and also 2 cards for D eagle?

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby Razzmann » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:14

Hello, no.

User avatar
realfakealex
Lieutenant
Posts: 1259
Joined: Mon 18 Feb 2013 11:59
Location: Kerbin
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby realfakealex » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:17

Razzmann wrote:Hello, no.


also, add never please

User avatar
nuke92
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 21:51
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby nuke92 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:19

:lol:

better reroll other stuff to make it more usable.
Last edited by nuke92 on Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:31, edited 2 times in total.
Image
"Spike MR is more accurate I'll give you that but Konkurs has more range and isn't prototype" - Warchat™ July 2017
"ALB added planes, RD added ships, WG4 will add Ekranoplans" - Warchat™ August 2017

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby HrcAk47 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:27

I support the 2 cards of Nighthawk :3
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

User avatar
FUBAR1939
Warrant Officer
Posts: 412
Joined: Thu 13 Jun 2013 06:24
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby FUBAR1939 » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:29

Yes, 2 cards with rookie vet.
Image

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:34

Razzmann wrote:Hello, no.


Terrible Inf, Mediocre AA besides Patriot, awful Recon and Support. Average Airfoce. Plus the Nighhawk gets shot down by even AA worth 30 I made a post about it with enough evidence. 0% Ecm gets shot down by everything once it's spotted, 2 cards of 1 rookie isn't a big deal. Infact the whole Nation Needs a rebalance, that's how much usa sucks.

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby Razzmann » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:45

Why did you not bring up these arguments in the first, opening post?

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Terrible Inf

Canda can help out pretty well here. You also have very good fire support.

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Mediocre AA besides Patriot

Chapparral A1 and A3 are not really mediocre, especially with the much needed HP buff. Pivads being the only system with .2s aim time is also above average. Centurion Marksmen can also be nice.

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:awful Recon

Awful? Not really. Longbow, Rangers, Bradley, Acav are all very playable. Even the Lav-25 has its place even though people like to deny that.

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Support

Well, aa was mentioned already. Arty is not that great, that is true.


GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Average Airfoce

I don't know why people keep on saying the Plane tab is "terrible" or "average". You have an excellent AT plane with the Hornet, very good ASFs with the Block 52 and F-15C. Wide variety of good SEAD planes. F-15D and Nighthawk are not bad, yes they have low availability, but having a good/ strong bomber card is not really important nowadays.

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Plus the Nighhawk gets shot down by even AA worth 30 I made a post about it with enough evidence.

You can also lose a Raven to a 30pts AA piece. You showed one example if I remember correctly. I don't know if that qualifiers as "enough evidence". And I also think that you even got critted by the OSA? I am not 100% sure anymore.

Though with the LGB change it could be ok with 2 on rookie, the LGBs would not hit as much. But even then, looking at how the Kurnass is still (one of) the best grouns support plane even on rookie, I am not sure whether I would like that.

User avatar
damoj
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 322
Joined: Mon 26 Sep 2016 10:07
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby damoj » Sun 11 Dec 2016 14:59

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Hello, Can we get 2 cards for Nighthawk and also 2 cards for D eagle?


No. Just use the Aarvark or forgo bombers.

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Nighthawk

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Sun 11 Dec 2016 15:19

Razzmann wrote:Why did you not bring up these arguments in the first, opening post?

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Terrible Inf

Canda can help out pretty well here. You also have very good fire support.

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Mediocre AA besides Patriot

Chapparral A1 and A3 are not really mediocre, especially with the much needed HP buff. Pivads being the only system with .2s aim time is also above average. Centurion Marksmen can also be nice.

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:awful Recon

Awful? Not really. Longbow, Rangers, Bradley, Acav are all very playable. Even the Lav-25 has its place even though people like to deny that.

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Support

Well, aa was mentioned already. Arty is not that great, that is true.


GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Average Airfoce

I don't know why people keep on saying the Plane tab is "terrible" or "average". You have an excellent AT plane with the Hornet, very good ASFs with the Block 52 and F-15C. Wide variety of good SEAD planes. F-15D and Nighthawk are not bad, yes they have low availability, but having a good/ strong bomber card is not really important nowadays.

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Plus the Nighhawk gets shot down by even AA worth 30 I made a post about it with enough evidence.

You can also lose a Raven to a 30pts AA piece. You showed one example if I remember correctly. I don't know if that qualifiers as "enough evidence". And I also think that you even got critted by the OSA? I am not 100% sure anymore.

Though with the LGB change it could be ok with 2 on rookie, the LGBs would not hit as much. But even then, looking at how the Kurnass is still (one of) the best grouns support plane even on rookie, I am not sure whether I would like that.


Yeah, all that, other nations got the same if not even better than all that. besides the longbow, atacms and pats.

About the Canadian Infantry, you have the TH-495, Canadian Rifles and Canadian Airbone, The result is the same, Terrible-Mediocre Inf.
Privads has a very dissapointing range, Chaparral A1 fails everyshot, and u only get 4-3 Chaparral A3, Centurion Marksmen is probably the slowest Vehicle in the Game. u can say all u want, but when u compare them to other nations, they're clearly shit, every aspect of them; Speed, Availavility, Quality, Acc, etc.

About the Recon: Yes longbow is good, i agree, but u have to be very careful to use it. Rangers is meh, Other recon troops have sniper rifles, AA or even Super Laser Projectiles like the israeli ones, acav is ass , lav 25 is mediocre, it's fast and that's it. the soviet btrs beat it. the Bradley is too expensive, has very limited availability and in most of the maps is useless.

People say that because usa does have an average airforce. Yeah the hornet is good, the ASFs are nothing special, the F-15C is the worst ASF of the same generation. u can't compare it to a rafale, or a su27 pu and others. Then u have the Nighthawk, That has 0% ecm, and that is traduced in being shot down by the shittiest Missile AA in the game, and you only have ONE, It clearly sucks, and if u say the contrary, u need to see a doctor, because you're probably getting blind. If u can't have 2 per card, atleast let me have 2 cards, like all the other nations, USA is the only one that gets fucked this way. I don't understand why you're tryng to make it seem like they're good and don't need anything, When they get outclassed by other factions in everything besides 3-5 units.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests