Page 22 of 26

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 17:31
by Markenzwieback
AmberT wrote:professional fanboy

Oh boy! :lol:

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 17:38
by Demonicjapsel
AmberT wrote:Do you really think that a replica of the forum can hurts my sensibilities? I do not want to waste time in disputes with professional fanboys, I would like to understand the point of view of certain players.


Marken is a lot of things, but not a Fanboy. Its a Forum, which as the dictionary puts it
a situation or meeting in which people can talk about a problem or matter especially of public interest


if you don't want people to disagree with you, or make that apparent, then you should reconsider being here.

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 17:46
by Xeno426
AmberT wrote: I do not want to waste time in disputes with professional fanboys, I would like to understand the point of view of certain players.

Professional? Who's paying him?

If you want only the response of one person, PM exist exactly for that. It is farcical and childish to believe only one person can respond to a comment like "US is way better than USSR" and not expect to be called out on it.

Hell, the fact the Eugen saw fit to remove SOVKOR and not NORAD would suggest that even Eugen does not agree with you, unless you also think they are "professional fanboys".

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 17:48
by IC4theBoys
The sole argument of "inf is equal cause of single good at launcher" is hillarious. Lets not consider amount and types of available fire support, comparative inf cost-efficiency, limitations for certain units cause of transport options and all the useless stuff like this, das vampyrs sideshottin muh cute boxies, balanced, ho. :lol:

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 17:58
by AmberT
Demonicjapsel wrote:Marken is a lot of things, but not a Fanboy. Its a Forum, which as the dictionary puts it

Ok
Demonicjapsel wrote:if you don't want people to disagree with you, or make that apparent, then you should reconsider being here.


First -All people have equal rights but people are not equal.
Second I agree with the fact that people may not agree with me.
Question is with whom to argue? I think you can argue only with those who consider the game as a contest.

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 18:08
by AmberT
Xeno426 wrote:Professional? Who's paying him?

this is just a metaphor for a person who writes a lot on this forum. Do not cling to the words.
Xeno426 wrote:Hell, the fact the Eugen saw fit to remove SOVKOR and not NORAD would suggest that even Eugen does not agree with you, unless you also think they are "professional fanboys".

I dont care about SOVKOR and yes! i think Eugens makes strange thinks. Just because they do not understand the game. Each patch 2 steps in forward and 1.5 steps back.
Xeno426 wrote:If you want only the response of one person, PM exist exactly for that. It is farcical and childish to believe only one person can respond to a comment like "US is way better than USSR" and not expect to be called out on it.

maybe you're right. but it is not very convenient to discus with 3-5 people.

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 19:19
by Mike
If you expect to post something controversial, you best expect several people to jump on it. If you dont like it, you just shouldn't post it.

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 19:29
by Markenzwieback
AmberT wrote:
Xeno426 wrote:Professional? Who's paying him?

this is just a metaphor for a person who writes a lot on this forum. Do not cling to the words.

Yay, we are all professional fanboys! :mrgreen:

Except AmberT obviously.

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 19:35
by nande
AmberT at least plays US in ranked, successfully too

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 19:52
by Seryn
Markenzwieback wrote:
AmberT wrote:
Xeno426 wrote:Professional? Who's paying him?

this is just a metaphor for a person who writes a lot on this forum. Do not cling to the words.

Yay, we are all professional fanboys! :mrgreen:

Except AmberT obviously.


AmberT confirmed for Russian Bias levels of Bias

nande wrote:AmberT at least plays US in ranked, successfully too


That's like saying I use the Negev or Minimi successfully in CSGO Competitive (which I do) it's true, but it doesn't contribute to the point that they arent cost effective.