Page 23 of 26

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 19:55
by throwaway
Seryn wrote:That's like saying I use the Negev or Minimi successfully in CSGO Competitive (which I do) it's true, but it doesn't contribute to the point that they arent cost effective.


"Successfully" in this case implies against high-tier players, I doubt it's global elite games where you're competitive with your negev.

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 19:58
by AmberT
Seryn wrote:That's like saying I use the Negev or Minimi successfully in CSGO Competitive (which I do) it's true, but it doesn't contribute to the point that they arent cost effective.

Difficult! can you be more specific?

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 20:00
by AmberT
throwaway wrote:
Seryn wrote:That's like saying I use the Negev or Minimi successfully in CSGO Competitive (which I do) it's true, but it doesn't contribute to the point that they arent cost effective.


"Successfully" in this case implies against high-tier players, I doubt it's global elite games where you're competitive with your negev.

You mean the game against ThePriyad?

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 20:10
by Seryn
throwaway wrote:
Seryn wrote:That's like saying I use the Negev or Minimi successfully in CSGO Competitive (which I do) it's true, but it doesn't contribute to the point that they arent cost effective.


"Successfully" in this case implies against high-tier players, I doubt it's global elite games where you're competitive with your negev.


I haven't played against any top tier players in any set game since Ace Combat Assault Horizon (Iirc last time I did was in a Miami Deathmatch with the Top leaderboard NA Players with my F-4E, LRAAMs served me well there) (which is a seperate genre from CSGO and Wargame). I as doubt Amber plays against the best WG players (is there even such a thing?) and wins as USA.

AmberT wrote:
Seryn wrote:That's like saying I use the Negev or Minimi successfully in CSGO Competitive (which I do) it's true, but it doesn't contribute to the point that they arent cost effective.

Difficult! can you be more specific?


I was as Specific as possible. Any more specific and it would be a full blog post... :?

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 20:16
by AmberT
Seryn wrote: I as doubt Amber plays against the best WG players (is there even such a thing?) and wins as USA.

You will be surprised! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwHRdIwp66c

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 20:32
by Markenzwieback
AmberT wrote:
Seryn wrote: I as doubt Amber plays against the best WG players (is there even such a thing?) and wins as USA.

You will be surprised! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwHRdIwp66c

Sure helps your point a lot when, in the video, you only play against a) a very inferior player in rank of 2nd Lt. or b) play USA vs. USA.

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 20:50
by Coal143
nande wrote:AmberT at least plays US in ranked, successfully too


Let's not get ahead of ourselves here

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 20:52
by I WUB PUGS
GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Hello, Can we get 2 cards for Nighthawk and also 2 cards for D eagle?


There was a time, during ALB, and it was both glorious and horrifying. The bombs also had a wider explosion radius. It was brutal.

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 20:53
by AmberT
Markenzwieback wrote:
AmberT wrote:
Seryn wrote: I as doubt Amber plays against the best WG players (is there even such a thing?) and wins as USA.

You will be surprised! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwHRdIwp66c

Sure helps your point a lot when, in the video, you only play against a) a very inferior player in rank of 2nd Lt. or b) play USA vs. USA.

A) I`m playing USA after last patch you found all my game on youtube channel.
B) I thought it was cool that I won the best player for the US

Re: Nighthawk

Posted: Mon 9 Jan 2017 21:40
by Erich Honecker
USA and USSR is pretty equal in current balance, but in different ways.

With USSR you have strong wheeled opening, and abilities for strong helo opening, in the same time US dont have any good wheeled autocanons, but they have very good aa helos.

In terms of infantry balance USA had a very big gap - they dont have any infantry ATGM teams. This makes city and key points defence very problematic.