Humvee

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Razzmann » Tue 20 Dec 2016 11:39

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:so now Finland can have his own lav25 but USA doesn't?

Finland does not have any LAVs either.

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Tue 20 Dec 2016 12:09

Razzmann wrote:
GuerreroDelAlba wrote:so now Finland can have his own lav25 but USA doesn't?

Finland does not have any LAVs either.


Finland does have LAVs (Light Armored Vehicle) , not exactly a Lav-25 but Something like it, wich is by the way, better and cheaper

Image

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Razzmann » Tue 20 Dec 2016 12:13

But it's not a LAV.

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Tue 20 Dec 2016 13:28

Razzmann wrote:But it's not a LAV.


It's a LAV, By terminology it's a Light Armored Vehicle. it really could be anything, an exact Definition Does not Exist. people use the terminolgy they want, is it a vehicle? Yes. Is it Armored? Yes. is it considered Light? Yes. And it also Transports Troops. it might as well be a LAV or a APC. they're both correct.

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Razzmann » Tue 20 Dec 2016 13:40

Then everything with armour that carries troops is a LAV, including the LVTP which is available to Marines and SMAW. And you also got the M113s.

User avatar
Medan
Warrant Officer
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue 18 Jun 2013 23:06
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Medan » Tue 20 Dec 2016 13:44

Scintillating discussion.
Image

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Razzmann » Tue 20 Dec 2016 13:49

Also, transports are always cheaper than non-transports.

Sleksa
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2265
Joined: Tue 14 May 2013 12:26
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Sleksa » Tue 20 Dec 2016 13:58

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Yeah, it's not like i paid for it, so i guess i can't ask for it. 5 pt buff to Humvee is an alternative to buffing the American Infantry Tab. Wich eugen refuses to do something about, same thing with their infantry transports, so now Finland can have his own lav25 but USA doesn't? give me a break. It's eugen's moral duty to keep a balance in the game, and that includes playable factions.


Are you also advocating for the following

2 armor xa's for finland (norway can but finland can't, did the vikings add troll hides inside their apcs to make them superior?)

amraam multiroles for usa (scandi/dutch can but usa can't, completely ruins my immersions)

eots hawk for usa (some tiny turd in northern europe can but usa can't, give me a break)

a stat clone sholef for finland (israel can but finland can't, eugen fix unacceptable)

a better eryx and apilas for france (yugoslavia can but france can't, what a joke)

a better strela 10 for ussr (some dingy a*s nation in mediterranean can but a superpower ussr can't. bias confirmed)

non-rad newa for ussr/cz/pol/fin/ddr/nk (a country that literally stopped existing can but mighty socialist powers can't? blufor bias confirmed)

massively accurate centurions (sweden can but the former world's biggest superpower island nation can't, this should be eugen's morsel duty to fix)

no autocannon on some british wheeled transports (uk can't but somehow it's obviously completely fine for the french, eugen bias confirmed!)

Spoiler : :
I do agree though that the base nations&coalitions as well as dlc nations&coalitions need to be on the same level, which they currently aren't
Image

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:07

Razzmann wrote:Then everything with armour that carries troops is a LAV, including the LVTP which is available to Marines and SMAW. And you also got the M113s.


If we follow the technicalities a LAV not necessarily transport troops. an APC does carry troops neccesarily.

For Example, the M113s and the Lav 25 are both LAV and APC

But the COMVAT in RD is only a LAV since it can't Transport Troops.

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:11

Sleksa wrote:
GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Yeah, it's not like i paid for it, so i guess i can't ask for it. 5 pt buff to Humvee is an alternative to buffing the American Infantry Tab. Wich eugen refuses to do something about, same thing with their infantry transports, so now Finland can have his own lav25 but USA doesn't? give me a break. It's eugen's moral duty to keep a balance in the game, and that includes playable factions.


Are you also advocating for the following

2 armor xa's for finland (norway can but finland can't, did the vikings add troll hides inside their apcs to make them superior?)

amraam multiroles for usa (scandi/dutch can but usa can't, completely ruins my immersions)

eots hawk for usa (some tiny turd in northern europe can but usa can't, give me a break)

a stat clone sholef for finland (israel can but finland can't, eugen fix unacceptable)

a better eryx and apilas for france (yugoslavia can but france can't, what a joke)

a better strela 10 for ussr (some dingy a*s nation in mediterranean can but a superpower ussr can't. bias confirmed)

non-rad newa for ussr/cz/pol/fin/ddr/nk (a country that literally stopped existing can but mighty socialist powers can't? blufor bias confirmed)

massively accurate centurions (sweden can but the former world's biggest superpower island nation can't, this should be eugen's morsel duty to fix)

no autocannon on some british wheeled transports (uk can't but somehow it's obviously completely fine for the french, eugen bias confirmed!)

Spoiler : :
I do agree though that the base nations&coalitions as well as dlc nations&coalitions need to be on the same level, which they currently aren't


Did u forgot that USA is supossed to be a Super Power? We're talking about Usa not Having the Lav 25 as infantry transport wich is canadian and was adopted by the usa, The ridiculous thing is Finland having his own better version, but usa can't, using the logic that it is a super power. adding to this the awful infantry, it obviously isn't acceptable.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 101 guests