Humvee

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Razzmann » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:13

Did you forget that this is a game? And USA / USSR should not be superior to all other decks?

Sleksa
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2265
Joined: Tue 14 May 2013 12:26
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Sleksa » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:14

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:
Sleksa wrote:
GuerreroDelAlba wrote:Yeah, it's not like i paid for it, so i guess i can't ask for it. 5 pt buff to Humvee is an alternative to buffing the American Infantry Tab. Wich eugen refuses to do something about, same thing with their infantry transports, so now Finland can have his own lav25 but USA doesn't? give me a break. It's eugen's moral duty to keep a balance in the game, and that includes playable factions.


Are you also advocating for the following

Spoiler : :
2 armor xa's for finland (norway can but finland can't, did the vikings add troll hides inside their apcs to make them superior?)

amraam multiroles for usa (scandi/dutch can but usa can't, completely ruins my immersions)

eots hawk for usa (some tiny turd in northern europe can but usa can't, give me a break)

a stat clone sholef for finland (israel can but finland can't, eugen fix unacceptable)

a better eryx and apilas for france (yugoslavia can but france can't, what a joke)

a better strela 10 for ussr (some dingy a*s nation in mediterranean can but a superpower ussr can't. bias confirmed)

non-rad newa for ussr/cz/pol/fin/ddr/nk (a country that literally stopped existing can but mighty socialist powers can't? blufor bias confirmed)

massively accurate centurions (sweden can but the former world's biggest superpower island nation can't, this should be eugen's morsel duty to fix)

no autocannon on some british wheeled transports (uk can't but somehow it's obviously completely fine for the french, eugen bias confirmed!)


Spoiler : :
I do agree though that the base nations&coalitions as well as dlc nations&coalitions need to be on the same level, which they currently aren't


Did u forgot that USA is supossed to be a Super Power? We're talking about Usa not Having the Lav 25 as infantry transport wich is canadian and was adopted by the usa, The ridiculous thing is Finland having his own better version, but usa can't, using the logic that it is a super power. adding to this the awful infantry, it obviously isn't acceptable.


Did you forget that USSR is supposedly a Super Power? I mean we're talking about the ussr not having a non-rad neva which is designed and made by ussr. The ridiculous thing is that Yugoslavia has it's own better version along with a better strela 10 but ussr can't. Using that logic yugoslavia and Poland are superpowers due to haveing better nevas. Adding to this the lack of 10pt wheeled apc's, it obviously breaks the game.
Image

User avatar
nuke92
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 21:51
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby nuke92 » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:15

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:
Razzmann wrote:But it's not a LAV.


It's a LAV, By terminology it's a Light Armored Vehicle. it really could be anything, an exact Definition Does not Exist. people use the terminolgy they want, is it a vehicle? Yes. Is it Armored? Yes. is it considered Light? Yes. And it also Transports Troops. it might as well be a LAV or a APC. they're both correct.


or MRAP/MRAV... what is your point?
wheeled APCs are obviously the Finnish flavour, think Patria AMV, the bread and butter APC of 6 countries by now.
Last edited by nuke92 on Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:18, edited 3 times in total.
Image
"Spike MR is more accurate I'll give you that but Konkurs has more range and isn't prototype" - Warchat™ July 2017
"ALB added planes, RD added ships, WG4 will add Ekranoplans" - Warchat™ August 2017

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:16

Razzmann wrote:Did you forget that this is a game? And USA / USSR should not be superior to all other decks?


and they should not be inferior to all other deck too.

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Razzmann » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:17

GuerreroDelAlba wrote:
Razzmann wrote:Did you forget that this is a game? And USA / USSR should not be superior to all other decks?


and they should not be inferior to all other deck too.

Which they are not. Not to mention that USA has a coalition available.

User avatar
nuke92
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 21:51
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby nuke92 » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:18

just because it's a super power it is supposed to fill each and every flavour there is?
Image
"Spike MR is more accurate I'll give you that but Konkurs has more range and isn't prototype" - Warchat™ July 2017
"ALB added planes, RD added ships, WG4 will add Ekranoplans" - Warchat™ August 2017

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:18

nuke92 wrote:
GuerreroDelAlba wrote:
Razzmann wrote:But it's not a LAV.


It's a LAV, By terminology it's a Light Armored Vehicle. it really could be anything, an exact Definition Does not Exist. people use the terminolgy they want, is it a vehicle? Yes. Is it Armored? Yes. is it considered Light? Yes. And it also Transports Troops. it might as well be a LAV or a APC. they're both correct.


or MRAP/MRAV... what is you point?
wheeled APC are obviously the Finnish flavour, think Patria AMV, the bread and butter APC of 6 countries by now.


not my point, razzmann brought up the lav thing because he tried to be a smart sarcastic kid.

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby Razzmann » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:21

Did I rustle your jimmies?

Maybe you should read this if you have problems winning with USA: viewtopic.php?f=155&t=59069#p1007440

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:26

Razzmann wrote:
GuerreroDelAlba wrote:
Razzmann wrote:Did you forget that this is a game? And USA / USSR should not be superior to all other decks?


and they should not be inferior to all other deck too.

Which they are not. Not to mention that USA has a coalition available.


Again.. It is inferior in almost everything to other nations, and because of that it rellies in meme units (longbow, Patriots, Atacms) forcing it to be used in large team games (3v3, 4v4, 10v10)

Everyone is playing Israel, Entente and Baltic Front. and before that everyone was playing Eastern Block or Commonwealth, and before that alot of people played mechanized and moto decks and before that people played mixed decks, and before that people were playing eurocorps or ussr. and before that people used to play Red Dragons and another i don't remember. USA was never the meta.

User avatar
GuerreroDelAlba
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon 9 Mar 2015 05:10
Contact:

Re: Humvee

Postby GuerreroDelAlba » Tue 20 Dec 2016 14:26

Razzmann wrote:Did I rustle your jimmies?

Maybe you should read this if you have problems winning with USA: viewtopic.php?f=155&t=59069#p1007440


i made it to LtG playing Norad mate, the dlc nations took me by surprise but im going back to it.

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests