another505 wrote:Oh and closed beta....... were you there to witness the meme?
Nah. Didn't you knew that T-72BU with 50% acc was absolutely balanced against M1A2 with 25 AP?
I wouldn't really say NORAD is worth much anymore. Canada's infantry combos are pretty much dead besides Eryx and that plus Wolverine and Leopards aren't quite worth the -5AP. This is my current NORAD deck and honestly it's not really worth all that much now that US infantry can somewhat stand on their own.GuerreroDelAlba wrote:The problem is, it's too hard and very unreasonable, if it wasn't for canada, my deck would be trash, In ranked games, other units outperform USA very easily, now with the new dlcs Israel, Entente and Baltic Front outperform American Infantry easily, Transports too theirs can do things better, faster, harder and cheaper, people run around with insane Motorized non radar f&f AA, so prowlers/raven are useless, and so is the Longbow with all the very cost efficient AA and people charging planes at it, and even then Redfor helicopters are way stronger than the bunch of weak cobras usa has, the tanks are okay, but the recon is average at best, other nations have tanks as recon, and decent infantry recon, israel has ATGM recon the Maglans and Finland has the AA recon, the light vehicle recon are better than the lav25, the support tab is okay, but i really don't like the airforce, if it wasn't for canada, the ASF would be very expensive, the bombers are expensive and have very limited availavility, like F-111E are bad because they have a very linear bombs unload, you only get 1 card with 1 D Eagle that is going to get shot down in it's first run by either 2 ITO 90 or 2 M90 Sava, sometimes only 1 is needed, and the nighthawk, it's a miracle if that thing survives any Missile AA worth 40-60 pts and you only get one as well. I mean, every nation has it's strenghts and weakness but usa's weakness really lack some logic.
COMVAT is strongly bad. It is nowhere near okay.Killertomato wrote:COMVAT is strongly okay. Too bad the HVMS does everything it does better...
another505 wrote:Mike wrote:another505 wrote:Oh and closed beta....... were you there to witness the meme?
The Smash Smerch?
every form of MLRS was broken back then, but smerch was the top.
Pre DLC-1 was worse in my opinion. its Closed Beta, you are expecting changes and patches so have some fun.
But Pre DLC-1, was a long trek of pain. blufor was in complete dominance, the meta was helo drops(stop +unload), chally 2 with 10 15pts 7fav centurions in the front to protect it.
redfor complete shit. RD was utterly crap, USSR's theme was everything being overpriced, T80u was 170pts with 40 accuracy, no autoloader!! EB wasnt alive then
The point of the cheap tank card in this deck is to be a meatshield. If I actually wanted a performing tank I would have grabbed MEXAS. The 70-85pt bracket just isn't worth taking with M-84A and Vihor basically making the entire class irrelevant. The HA has the good fortune of basically hard countering DLC tank tabs sans the (pocket) superheavies so it's my bread and butter at the moment. Kind of wish the M1A1 got 20AP too. It just feels weird seeing the two with different AP stats.Razzmann wrote:With all the cries about how bad the M1 line is, why no Mexas?
Oh the days of one shotting T-72A at max range.Mike wrote:I remember the BU was garage and the M1A2 was based God with perfect stabs and 25AP.
Razzmann wrote:With all the cries about how bad the M1 line is, why no Mexas?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests