Leave no man behind: WGermany

User avatar
Capion
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed 7 Sep 2016 13:43
Location: Cologne, Germany
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Capion » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:46

Killertomato wrote:
Razzmann wrote:What would Hot-3 look like? Stat wise that is.


HOT 2 with a big AP buff.


With the same range what does it matter?

KampfKeksKrieger wrote:They have a certain strength, I find the marder vts1 quite useful (because high 15 AP for 25 points, this is even better than theAMX-10 RC SB from France, so YEA (even with lower ROF and some bit weaker stats):


Maybe before everybody was driving cheap (or less cheap, pipe dream-) recon tanks around and the T-55s RoF was buffed. The AMX-10 Recon is entire orders of magnitute better than both btw.
Last edited by Capion on Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:48, edited 1 time in total.
In memoriam: Gebirgsfernmeldebataillon 210

User avatar
Sweedish_Gunner
Brigadier
Posts: 3105
Joined: Thu 25 Apr 2013 20:23
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Sweedish_Gunner » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:47

Killertomato wrote:
Razzmann wrote:What would Hot-3 look like? Stat wise that is.


HOT 2 with a big AP buff.


Isn't it 24 AP right now?
Image

User avatar
Xeno426
Carbon 13
Posts: 11965
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 21:27
Location: Acheron, Hadley's Hope
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Xeno426 » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:47

Capion wrote:Maybe 2 AMRAAMs on the ERC instead of 4 completely useless missles to justify the price for a SEAD plane and the turn radius the Tornados deserve? Making the Peace Rhine better is probably out of the question with the SEM buff.

Tornado IDS could not use the AMRAAM. ERC was based on the IDS, and added more electronic countermeasure systems (in place of the guns) and AGM-88 capability. Still no AMRAAM. Besides, where would they be carried?
Image
CloakandDagger wrote:And you're one of the people with the shiny colored name. No wonder the game is in the state it's in.

User avatar
Akkku
First Sergeant
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2016 17:03

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Akkku » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:48

nuke92 wrote:Any chance of a PAH-2 Tiger with Trigat LR?
Is it really that much ootf? I mean we have Spike MR and LR allready...

It's not more ootf than the half of the units from the pay-to-win factions.
1997 or 1998 was the first test.
President of Eugen

User avatar
Capion
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed 7 Sep 2016 13:43
Location: Cologne, Germany
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Capion » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:49

Xeno426 wrote:
Capion wrote:Maybe 2 AMRAAMs on the ERC instead of 4 completely useless missles to justify the price for a SEAD plane and the turn radius the Tornados deserve? Making the Peace Rhine better is probably out of the question with the SEM buff.

Tornado IDS could not use the AMRAAM. ERC was based on the IDS, and added more electronic countermeasure systems (in place of the guns) and AGM-88 capability. Still no AMRAAM. Besides, where would they be carried?


No offense, but realism went out the window with Yugoslavia. But again: Its a list of proposals. I am saying: Choose something Eugen! (pls)
In memoriam: Gebirgsfernmeldebataillon 210

User avatar
Sweedish_Gunner
Brigadier
Posts: 3105
Joined: Thu 25 Apr 2013 20:23
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Sweedish_Gunner » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:54

Akkku wrote:
CandyMan wrote:Pf44 to 15 ap or less then you can have 10 pt jager.

Image

Now get lost.


This made me laugh.

Also I'm pretty sure Yugoslavian planes aren't using munitions they couldn't use.
Image

User avatar
Xeno426
Carbon 13
Posts: 11965
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 21:27
Location: Acheron, Hadley's Hope
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Xeno426 » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:56

Capion wrote:No offense, but realism went out the window with Yugoslavia. But again: Its a list of proposals. I am saying: Choose something Eugen! (pls)

You'll notice the Yugo J-22 doesn't have the R-77 or Mica EM.

Two Wrongs fallacy and False Equivalence fallacy.
Image
CloakandDagger wrote:And you're one of the people with the shiny colored name. No wonder the game is in the state it's in.

User avatar
Capion
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed 7 Sep 2016 13:43
Location: Cologne, Germany
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Capion » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:56

Sweedish_Gunner wrote:
Akkku wrote:
CandyMan wrote:Pf44 to 15 ap or less then you can have 10 pt jager.

Image

Now get lost.


This made me laugh.

Also I'm pretty sure Yugoslavian planes aren't using munitions they couldn't use.


Yeah thats Jäger are OP for you. They still say that on reddit. Also: He didnt even mention the transports available and the hidden stats on the MG.

Xeno426 wrote:You'll notice the Yugo J-22 doesn't have the R-77 or Mica EM.

Two Wrongs fallacy and False Equivalence fallacy.


I certainly didnt :lol: . Not refering to the planes though. Although you're probably not wrong on the ERC. I am reaching here.
Last edited by Capion on Fri 20 Jan 2017 17:00, edited 4 times in total.
In memoriam: Gebirgsfernmeldebataillon 210

User avatar
Killertomato
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13730
Joined: Mon 9 Jul 2012 02:46
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby Killertomato » Fri 20 Jan 2017 16:59

Capion wrote:
Killertomato wrote:
Razzmann wrote:What would Hot-3 look like? Stat wise that is.


HOT 2 with a big AP buff.


With the same range what does it matter?


On the Tiger? It doesn't.
orcbuster wrote:USSR gets prototype marsupials, why would you need moose when you got stuff with kickers like that AND transport capability? And I'm not even gonna START on the french Marsupilami, I don't even think thats a real animal! Why no trolls for Norway?

User avatar
nuke92
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2016 21:51
Contact:

Re: Leave no man behind: WGermany

Postby nuke92 » Fri 20 Jan 2017 17:00

I guess Trigat would be a F&F Hellfire stats clone basically.
I thought of exchanging 4 HOT-2 with 4 Trigats.

But the whole jack of all trades concept is probably just plain wrong.
Image
"Spike MR is more accurate I'll give you that but Konkurs has more range and isn't prototype" - Warchat™ July 2017
"ALB added planes, RD added ships, WG4 will add Ekranoplans" - Warchat™ August 2017

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests