Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

User avatar
Zero_Ecm
Sergeant
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue 15 Nov 2016 06:39
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby Zero_Ecm » Sat 4 Feb 2017 15:44

Get rid off Ka-52 by moving it to NAVAL tab as anti-ship helo.
Buff rest or USSR helo:
Give Mi-8 line to GRU
Buf mi-24V to 80s/90s version with 2-4 S-80 pods and 4 R-60M/igla-V (nerf price)
Ka-29TV to 0/0/0/1 armor, 6 HP and 30 pts
Ka-50. Remove iglas, allow to shoot air targets with missles.
Slightly buff Mi-24P's autocannon AP.

thelizardofdoom
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 129
Joined: Sat 2 Apr 2016 10:15
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby thelizardofdoom » Sat 4 Feb 2017 22:20

Helos are not USSRs main problem however. They need cost efficient grinding infantry other than low avail vdv and marosyka (yes im aware im not even close to spelling that right)

That or the widely coveted 15 man squad buff.
Yes im aware my grammar and spelling are dreadful. Email complaints to android for having terrible software or eugen for having a mobile unfriendly site.

User avatar
chykka
Brigadier
Posts: 3387
Joined: Wed 28 Nov 2012 14:55
Location: Canada, Alberta
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby chykka » Sat 4 Feb 2017 22:38

Mi24k already has rockets, Sead is good even in combination but people usually don't take both cards of exceptional optics. Unless of course your playing some Silliness that is Soviet Airborne.
Could give it a GsH even if it's on the hard points.
Image

Seryn
Sergeant Major of the Army
Posts: 360
Joined: Mon 5 Dec 2016 06:00
Contact:

uuRe: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby Seryn » Sun 5 Feb 2017 00:03

thelizardofdoom wrote:
another505 wrote:
thelizardofdoom wrote:Yes and the supercobra to. I am so over all this helo silliness. I played about 11 games today and was helo rushed 7 times. Death to helo sead missiles, because make no mistake...helo cheese is their main function.

are you playing rank or something?


Indeed but my point stands. The only tme you see SEAD helos is in silly start game helo cheese.


Or Recon. you know, its job.

thelizardofdoom
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 129
Joined: Sat 2 Apr 2016 10:15
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby thelizardofdoom » Sun 5 Feb 2017 02:01

chykka wrote:Mi24k already has rockets, Sead is good even in combination but people usually don't take both cards of exceptional optics. Unless of course your playing some Silliness that is Soviet Airborne.
Could give it a GsH even if it's on the hard points.


Is it really worth it to risk 200+ pts of helos just to check if they left radar on though?
Yes im aware my grammar and spelling are dreadful. Email complaints to android for having terrible software or eugen for having a mobile unfriendly site.

R3d Sh4mbala
Sergeant Major
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu 12 May 2016 06:17
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby R3d Sh4mbala » Sun 5 Feb 2017 05:05

thelizardofdoom wrote:
chykka wrote:Mi24k already has rockets, Sead is good even in combination but people usually don't take both cards of exceptional optics. Unless of course your playing some Silliness that is Soviet Airborne.
Could give it a GsH even if it's on the hard points.


Is it really worth it to risk 200+ pts of helos just to check if they left radar on though?

Image

Although I am wondering since Yugo got Grenade launching Mi-8. :idea:

Could a Mi-24 model transport or the KA-52 get some grenades?

Make it a low unit card infantry vaporizer.

User avatar
Sweedish_Gunner
Brigadier
Posts: 3105
Joined: Thu 25 Apr 2013 20:23
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby Sweedish_Gunner » Sun 5 Feb 2017 05:13

Ka-52 with grenades what?

'Here's our best helicopter comrade!'

'Da, put some super short range AGS-17's on it, we will confuse the enemy with our stupidity!'
Image

User avatar
another505
More than 10 000 messages. Soldier you are the leader of all armies!
Posts: 13128
Joined: Sun 21 Jul 2013 05:18
Location: Hiatus
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby another505 » Sun 5 Feb 2017 06:07

chykka wrote:Mi24k already has rockets, Sead is good even in combination but people usually don't take both cards of exceptional optics. Unless of course your playing some Silliness that is Soviet Airborne.
Could give it a GsH even if it's on the hard points.

U WOT?! :evil: :evil: :evil:


and no, its not worth ka-52 +mi24k when a single 70 pt chap can shut it down.
Image
Of Salt

User avatar
MARDER
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 344
Joined: Fri 20 Jul 2012 00:42
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby MARDER » Sun 5 Feb 2017 19:00

another505 wrote:
chykka wrote:Mi24k already has rockets, Sead is good even in combination but people usually don't take both cards of exceptional optics. Unless of course your playing some Silliness that is Soviet Airborne.
Could give it a GsH even if it's on the hard points.

U WOT?! :evil: :evil: :evil:


and no, its not worth ka-52 +mi24k when a single 70 pt chap can shut it down.



Or you send two suicide F4 for a total of 140 points out to kill it. You still make a plus.

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Should Ka-52 just lose its SEAD missile?

Postby HrcAk47 » Sun 5 Feb 2017 19:32

R3d Sh4mbala wrote:
Although I am wondering since Yugo got Grenade launching Mi-8. :idea: .


What?
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

Return to “Wargame : Red Dragon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests