Page 12 of 12

Re: No C-300 ?

Posted: Sat 9 Sep 2017 00:18
by Sleksa
molnibalage wrote:Bro, I have done it with K1 in 10v10 many times


Image

Re: No C-300 ?

Posted: Sat 9 Sep 2017 12:23
by HrcAk47
molnibalage wrote:Bro, I have done it with K1 in 10v10 many times


Please stop posting.

Re: No C-300 ?

Posted: Sat 9 Sep 2017 19:28
by molnibalage
HrcAk47 wrote:
molnibalage wrote:Bro, I have done it with K1 in 10v10 many times


Please stop posting.

Non only in 10 v 10... It was just and example...
Quite a funny recommendation for a user who really things that YUG technology is better than USA... :roll:

Re: No C-300 ?

Posted: Sun 10 Sep 2017 00:39
by nuke92
molnibalage wrote:
HrcAk47 wrote:
molnibalage wrote:Bro, I have done it with K1 in 10v10 many times


Please stop posting.

Non only in 10 v 10... It was just and example...
Quite a funny recommendation for a user who really things that YUG technology is better than USA... :roll:


oh boy :lol:


Re: No C-300 ?

Posted: Mon 11 Sep 2017 01:23
by chykka
How about S-200, it's still fine and in time frame. Did they maybe have more S-200 system to operate outside of their borders?

Guys shouldn't hate on 10v10 so hard,it's not as chaotic as you'd think. Besides it's harder too swing the balance of a 10v10 as individual when you only have 1/10 of the teams points. Don't knock it till you try it.

Re: No C-300 ?

Posted: Mon 11 Sep 2017 09:44
by FrangibleCover
chykka wrote:How about S-200, it's still fine and in time frame. Did they maybe have more S-200 system to operate outside of their borders?

SA-5 Gammon? The one with a 300km range? The one that needed to be concreted into a prepared site, was entirely for defence against strategic bombers and if my experience in C:MANO and before that Harpoon is anything to go by should be the first missile to receive 5% accuracy?

I don't think that's fine in any way.

Re: No C-300 ?

Posted: Mon 11 Sep 2017 12:15
by HrcAk47
chykka wrote:How about S-200, it's still fine and in time frame. Did they maybe have more S-200 system to operate outside of their borders?

Guys shouldn't hate on 10v10 so hard,it's not as chaotic as you'd think. Besides it's harder too swing the balance of a 10v10 as individual when you only have 1/10 of the teams points. Don't knock it till you try it.


If I didn't know any better, I'd think that this was trolling.

Re: No C-300 ?

Posted: Mon 11 Sep 2017 12:38
by molnibalage
chykka wrote:How about S-200, it's still fine and in time frame. Did they maybe have more S-200 system to operate outside of their borders?

Guys shouldn't hate on 10v10 so hard,it's not as chaotic as you'd think. Besides it's harder too swing the balance of a 10v10 as individual when you only have 1/10 of the teams points. Don't knock it till you try it.


S-200 was a 100% non mobile satic PVO system... Funniest and worst idea ever... Same if you asked BOMARC...