HrcAk47 wrote:lol. Hegelian dialectics are not the truth.
Truth is whatever anyone makes it out to be.
But formal logic, as a rule, allows for one conclusion only, so I'll keep sticking to that when debating inconsistencies. It's less prone to circlejerking.
HrcAk47 wrote:Rather, prove your proficiency of the game to convince us commoners that you know how to play.
I'll call upon that once I see the need for it.
I can understand it can be helpful when debating subjective balancing issues.