Blue Dragons lacking in infantry AT

[Nick Echo]

I have been playing Blue Dragon specialized decks for a while now, and I noticed that all of them besides the marine deck, lack in both high AP and good 20 RoF launchers. Seeing as both Japan and South Korea are using PanzerFaust 3 as their standard issue man portable AT launcher for a while now, and South Korean PzF3 is already in game, this problem could easily be resolved by giving the launcher to any Blue Dragon 85/90 non marine infantry, or at least to their weapon teams.

Without it, it is near impossible to efficiently fight supported even lower end heavier tanks in close quarters, where motorized/mechanized infantry is supposed to shine.

[Nerdfish]

Asked almost as often as DLC balance.
But Eugen seems to be over there in the SD wonderland at the moment.
They will see this as soon as they come back through.

[Fodder]

+1
http://eaglet.skr.jp/MILITARY/CARLGUSTAV.htm

(1992)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3ouUdlif8wc/V ... img044.jpg

[Nerdfish]

+1
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3ouUdlif8wc/V ... img044.jpg

Stabilized PZF confirmed on BD infantry

[QUAD]

+1
http://eaglet.skr.jp/MILITARY/CARLGUSTAV.htm

(1992)
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3ouUdlif8wc/V ... img044.jpg

Does the domestically produced CG M2 have superior penetrative capabilities?

[chykka]

Try the atgm jeeps?

[QUAD]

Try the atgm jeeps?

I find the real flaw with them is autocannons?

[Nerdfish]

vetted ChuMat are fine. Possibly.

[Nick Echo]

If some of you paid proper attention to the original post,you would have noticed, that the issues is close quarters anti vehicle engagements, not long range. Or are you saying, that atmg teams and jeeps are good inside the forests, at <400m?

[ardi223]

They dont have the best RPGs in game but they are not lacking in that division by no means.