Apparently Eugen though to give the T extra armor based on the seat removal, as anyone can plainly see in the base game's armory. In A&S the Su-25 has become the Su-25T and the Su-25T has become the Su-25TM, but the legacy rear armor values are still around. Given the name changes, it seems to me the rear armor should be standardized between the 2 planes, and since the Su-25 series are hardly unstoppable terrors in the face of stuff like the MiG-23AB, MiG-37 and Harrier GR.9, I Iwould prefer to see a buff rather than a nerf.
I'd prefer to just keep the stats the way they are and change the name. Perhaps a 5pt price drop, but not much else.
The SH-60B Sea Hawk is inferior to the Lynx 3 in every way, it is the same price, has half the ATGM load, half the availability per card, lower ECM, no air to air missiles and its slower. It needs a serious buff or a reroll.
Yeah, I agree. Sea-hawk is one of those units that hasn't had a lot of attention in A&S.
he UK's Green Jacket Javelin Team is listed as shock infantry, has shock infantry pricing and shock infantry weapons, but have not gotten their +5kph for being shock trained. They have a very low availability, and improving their speed would not make them too strong.
Odd. I'm pretty sure I intended them to have 25kph speed from the outset. I'll fix that.
The Danish Patruljekompgniet are listed as shock as well, but are priced as regulars, go regular speed and have regular battlerifles and a STAT LMG. They should have their training relisted as regular with no stat changes.
The Tigre HAP is currently overpriced, Soviet (and American) helicopter AA missiles have increase in range dramatically, but the Mistral has not changed at all. Although the HAP has gotten other improvements, mostly aimed at survivabitly, the painfully short range of the Mistral still leaves it too expensive for what it can do.
Also a unit that hasn't gotten much attention. The mistrals need to be bumped up to 2800m anyway. Could still do with a bit of a price reduction, even after that.
Most ROK infantry in Motorized deck depends on 3 cards of KW1 and some choppers.
ROK Motor deck needs cheaper and numerous transport vehicle.
My suggestion is KIA LTV.
Or I can jut add the K-511 to a couple more units.
Also, Baekho's 0/0/0/8/6 availability decreases to 0/0/0/6/4 when selected with KW1.
Yep. Because most high end transports have more limited availability than other options.
LMAT is underpriced, and Hyungoong needs some buff, too.
LMAT would probably be better off at 25pts but I don't see any reason to change the cost on the Hyungoong's.
Chu-MAT might need some price nerf, too.
Its a 21AP range 2450 missile. Don't kick a missile while its down. It doesn't need price nerfs.
You can grab up to 4 F3s in BD deck, and that number jumps to 6 in Japan only deck.
So? You have to give over two slots to do this. For a fighter with only 2 radar-AAMs with mediocre range.
And then what? Blue-drag only has one ATGM carrier, and its not great. Pure Japan has none. While it can provide HE support, the Japanese air is more about locking other players out of using the air-space than it is being able to win a battle with air power.
Also, F3 still needs some price nerf.
Wat? God no.
Its priced comparably to the Su-27Pu and trades a considerably smaller missile payload for good stealth.
ROK Habyungs, both heavy and vanilla needs some cheaper transport.
K200 or LTV might work.
This isn't a balance issue, this is a 'I want better stuff for my favorite nation' issue.
F111C is underpriced, and JPN F86 is overpriced, too.
Moreover, above picture also shows 65p Aussie F35.
F-86 could do with a price reduction.
65pts for a very niche fighter-bomber (mostly used for suiciding into redfor SAMs). Its more or less a Jaguar Gr.1 with Stealth, better survivability and some missiles for self defense.
They're both cheap because players hardly ever take cluster bombers. 65pts is how far I feel I have to reduce the price so players actually feel like its worth taking a plane that carries two cluster bombs and not much else.
A4K Kahu is overpriced.
No. Its a neat little ATGM carrier that fires its whole payload in one pass then evacs. And AP 30 damage has been scaled up in A&S, so its quite a lot better than AP28.
Most SRBMs are underpriced(75~85p).
They can deliver HE 18~30 barrage to anywhere on map and are much likely to survive than bombers are.
But they drain ammunition and a vulnerable to counter-battery fire from an attentive player.
DPRK Tokchon 122/130 is overpriced.
So is M1992 SPAAG.
Ok, this one I agree with.
Motostrelki is underpriced.
It can easily suppress 10~15p blufor counterparts with its seriously op 6PSD MG.
Then don't expect to walk blufor infantry towards dug in motostrelki and get away with it.
They're points efficient but situation infantry. Redfor is allowed to have fun toys to play with too. They're good as static defense in towns or forest edges against approaching infantry, but not a whole lot else.
If anything, they need a little work so they're not leagues ahead of the other 8pt redfor infantry out there, but they're staying at 8pts.