Faustmann Balance Mod Release V1.06

beares
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu 29 Oct 2015 08:17
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby beares » Wed 1 Feb 2017 21:27

Razzmann wrote:Well we are reroling the 121 into the 122, which means that the 121 will not be an option anymore. Scandinavia has the 2 cards of 122s as their only tanks that cost more than 90 points.


Oh, well in that case is a 23 FAV tank really OP considering that the next in line isn't the Strv 121 but something like the Strv 103D or one of the Danonorwegian Leo 1s? Unlike most other coalitions that actually get multiple heavies in between I mean.

Razzmann wrote:Vasto's mod: viewtopic.php?f=187&t=44298


Thanks. It looks awesome.

User avatar
Akkku
First Sergeant
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2016 17:03

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Akkku » Wed 1 Feb 2017 21:43

Razzmann wrote:Well we are reroling the 121 into the 122, which means that the 121 will not be an option anymore.

Image
Dumb weebs will like this post.
President of Eugen

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Razzmann » Wed 1 Feb 2017 21:51

beares wrote:Oh, well in that case is a 23 FAV tank really OP considering that the next in line isn't the Strv 121 but something like the Strv 103D or one of the Danonorwegian Leo 1s? Unlike most other coalitions that actually get multiple heavies in between I mean.

Well many other coalitions also get only 2 top tier tanks. We thought about giving it 23FAV, but then it would only be 2 per card. So instead we went for 2 cards with 22FAV. It is also part of their flavour really. They have a good superheavy and good mediums, but the overall lack of heavy tanks make their tank tab still subpar compared to other nations.

beares
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu 29 Oct 2015 08:17
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby beares » Wed 1 Feb 2017 22:10

Razzmann wrote:
beares wrote:Oh, well in that case is a 23 FAV tank really OP considering that the next in line isn't the Strv 121 but something like the Strv 103D or one of the Danonorwegian Leo 1s? Unlike most other coalitions that actually get multiple heavies in between I mean.

Well many other coalitions also get only 2 top tier tanks. We thought about giving it 23FAV, but then it would only be 2 per card. So instead we went for 2 cards with 22FAV. It is also part of their flavour really. They have a good superheavy and good mediums, but the overall lack of heavy tanks make their tank tab still subpar compared to other nations.


Yeah, what I am saying is that even with 2 cards of 23 FAV, the lack of any heavies at all would still put them roughly on par with or even below the rest. If they lack a heavy entirely, they ought to be somewhat compensated with a (very) good SH instead. They still get fewer options than other coalitions.

Consider most other coalitions have not only often 2 cards of SHs but also multiple heavies to choose from. Scandis now get no heavies.

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Razzmann » Wed 1 Feb 2017 22:21

beares wrote:Yeah, what I am saying is that even with 2 cards of 23 FAV, the lack of any heavies at all would still put them roughly on par with or even below the rest. If they lack a heavy entirely, they ought to be somewhat compensated with a (very) good SH instead. They still get fewer options than other coalitions.

Consider most other coalitions have not only often 2 cards of SHs but also multiple heavies to choose from. Scandis now get no heavies.

We'll see how it plays out. If their tank tab is underperforming compared to how we envisioned it, we can still buff it.

beares
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 144
Joined: Thu 29 Oct 2015 08:17
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby beares » Wed 1 Feb 2017 22:25

Razzmann wrote:
beares wrote:Yeah, what I am saying is that even with 2 cards of 23 FAV, the lack of any heavies at all would still put them roughly on par with or even below the rest. If they lack a heavy entirely, they ought to be somewhat compensated with a (very) good SH instead. They still get fewer options than other coalitions.

Consider most other coalitions have not only often 2 cards of SHs but also multiple heavies to choose from. Scandis now get no heavies.

We'll see how it plays out. If their tank tab is underperforming compared to how we envisioned it, we can still buff it.


It is your mod after all.

Sleksa
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 2265
Joined: Tue 14 May 2013 12:26
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Sleksa » Wed 1 Feb 2017 22:35

Razzmann wrote:
Xeno426 wrote:Have you guys considered balancing active-radar missiles by giving them a universal -5 or -10% accuracy compared to SARH missiles? Might even give reason to use the AIM-7P somewhere.

The only globale missile change we have on the list right now is the AIM-9L buff to 5HE. We tried not to do too many global changes at the start.


Considering how many western aircraft will suddenly get a massive increase in lethality vs how many red aircraft are stuck slinging 3he r-60's and other wonky loadouts with terrible accuracy (k-13 and r-13m series) this seems fairly counterproductive
Image

User avatar
Coal143
Master Sergeant
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed 27 Aug 2014 11:09
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Coal143 » Wed 1 Feb 2017 22:44

A nice little bonus for you guys, AA/ATGM Hybrid Unit Cards.

Spoiler : :
Image

Image


Courtesy of the amazing SEDMAN
Image

User avatar
Akkku
First Sergeant
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2016 17:03

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Akkku » Wed 1 Feb 2017 23:37

The AT12T should get the same stats as the PF-98.
President of Eugen

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Razzmann » Thu 2 Feb 2017 00:10

Sleksa wrote:
Razzmann wrote:
Xeno426 wrote:Have you guys considered balancing active-radar missiles by giving them a universal -5 or -10% accuracy compared to SARH missiles? Might even give reason to use the AIM-7P somewhere.

The only globale missile change we have on the list right now is the AIM-9L buff to 5HE. We tried not to do too many global changes at the start.


Considering how many western aircraft will suddenly get a massive increase in lethality vs how many red aircraft are stuck slinging 3he r-60's and other wonky loadouts with terrible accuracy (k-13 and r-13m series) this seems fairly counterproductive

But these missiles are mostly found on rather old multiroles, and would not really improve their lethality too much, whereas a lot of 110+ pts bluefor ASFs have 4 + 5HE missile combinations due to the AIM-9L having only 4HE.

Return to “Modding”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests