Faustmann Balance Mod Release V1.06

[Akkku]

Why does the AT12T not get the same stats as the PF98?
It had a ballistics computer and lrf in normal war game time frame. And so did the PzF3 T600 btw.

[Razzmann]

For the first version we are mostly changing / fixing stuff if we deem it important for balance.

[Oktoberfest]

Guess what, majority of the western companies crawled back into China after 1989, and that is in our timeline.

Soviet relationship is already thawing in 1988, campaign established the realignment of USSR to Asian allies too. So i don't see a problem in the narrative.

They did because the Soviet Union was not a threat anymore and China was an economical dwarf. And also because West was so arrogant that they never took into account that China would be able to copy the western technologies, still having that "yellow monkey attitude" towards them. An attitude you still find in the industry today despite China's achievements in the last 2 decade.

[keldon]

They did because the Soviet Union was not a threat anymore and China was an economical dwarf. And also because West was so arrogant that they never took into account that China would be able to copy the western technologies, still having that "yellow monkey attitude" towards them. An attitude you still find in the industry today despite China's achievements in the last 2 decade.

I'd like to point out that you are basically showing the same "yellow monkey" mentality which borders on rasicm. Basically the usual assumption that China doesn't have anything modern even in the 90s. The whole issue can be summerized by simple ignorance. Also all those western companies who crawled back into China, including the French, would have done it regardless of the situation of Soviet Union, you made it like won't happen because of some kind of ideological purity contest, which is simply not true.

@All: As for the unit changes in the mod. People suddenly find so daunting despite the fact that majority of them are in the RD thread including the stats for almost half a year!

The mod is still in development, but keep in mind one goal is to give unviable coalitions enough capabilities to make them viable. RD would obviously require the most work. For all further question head over to the fine tuning thread.

[Akkku]

@All: As for the unit changes in the mod. People suddenly find so daunting despite the fact that majority of them are in the RD thread including the stats for almost half a year!

It's not about the units, that were added, but rather about their fantasy stats. On top of that you can't assume that everyone read/cared about your red dragon thread.

[CommanderDef]

Looking at the RBS, where did the 16AP come from?

[Razzmann]

Looking at the RBS, where did the 16AP come from?

There is no documentation on the capabilities of the RBS-70 MK.II shaped charge warhead so we decided to put it in a spot where it would be usefull but not OP.

[keldon]

@All: As for the unit changes in the mod. People suddenly find so daunting despite the fact that majority of them are in the RD thread including the stats for almost half a year!

It's not about the units, that were added, but rather about their fantasy stats. On top of that you can't assume that everyone read/cared about your red dragon thread.

Stats suggestions are given reasons within the current game mechanics and abstractions. It's your problem if you don't read the stuff posted in the thread.

[Partibrejker]

Hello, just popped in to suggest that, if you are able, put in the "reveal" dates for the coalition/nation changes that you are making, just info wise, nothing more than that.

[mbetts]

Hello, just popped in to suggest that, if you are able, put in the "reveal" dates for the coalition/nation changes that you are making, just info wise, nothing more than that.

Soon(tm)