Faustmann Balance Mod Release V1.06

User avatar
Akkku
First Sergeant
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2016 17:03

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Akkku » Fri 3 Feb 2017 00:44

Partizaan wrote:
Akkku wrote:Why does the AT12T not get the same stats as the PF98?
It had a ballistics computer and lrf in normal war game time frame. And so did the PzF3 T600 btw.


No offense but:
Please stop it, man, my brain hurts.

If your brain hurts, that's a good sign, because it means that you are thinking. No offense though....
How many attempts did you make in this thread to start the 1000th discussion about real life weapon stats and their relation to each other? It's not really relevant.

Code: Select all

We attempt to find realistic solutions to problems, but the realism (mostly time frame) can be bent within reason.

Stop this inquisitive tone, write a book if you need to dump all your knowledge, let them work and make useful suggestions.

Stop this inquisitive tone on my posts. :lol:
President of Eugen

User avatar
Akkku
First Sergeant
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2016 17:03

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Akkku » Fri 3 Feb 2017 00:56

Razzmann wrote:
beares wrote:They already raised its TAV compared to 2A5 from 3 to 4 though.

Every super heavy will receive 4 top armour for balance purposes.

That sounds very nice. Arty spammers btfo!
President of Eugen

captaincarnage
Major
Posts: 1915
Joined: Sat 29 Mar 2014 23:50
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby captaincarnage » Fri 3 Feb 2017 01:12

Meh, decidedly unimpressed, you state in your preamble that Commonwealth's recon tab is bad and then proceed to do nothing about it.
I hope your buratino's die screaming.

User avatar
Coal143
Master Sergeant
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed 27 Aug 2014 11:09
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Coal143 » Fri 3 Feb 2017 01:14

HrcAk47 wrote:Moderna is a proper candidate for a supertank, since it has a fair bit stronger armor additions including both active and passive armor on top of a T-72M1 based chassis.


How far could we go with this, realistically?

captaincarnage wrote:Meh, decidedly unimpressed, you state in your preamble that Commonwealth's recon tab is bad and then proceed to do nothing about it.


You may have also noted the part where we said that it's one of the most well rounded coalitions in the game
Image

User avatar
Partibrejker
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun 22 Feb 2015 22:14
Location: Elektronska Industrija, Yugoslavia
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Partibrejker » Fri 3 Feb 2017 01:20

Azaz3l wrote:PT-91 being more armored than T-80U and having more RoF as well - w a t.


easy, USSR is yet to come :)
Spoiler : :

User avatar
Akkku
First Sergeant
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2016 17:03

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Akkku » Fri 3 Feb 2017 01:22

captaincarnage wrote:Meh, decidedly unimpressed, you state in your preamble that Commonwealth's recon tab is bad and then proceed to do nothing about it.

Well this patch is only a few (weeks?)/ days old. Just ask why and maybe they will fix it.
President of Eugen

User avatar
Akkku
First Sergeant
Posts: 209
Joined: Wed 9 Nov 2016 17:03

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Akkku » Fri 3 Feb 2017 01:25

Azaz3l wrote:PT-91 being more armored than T-80U and having more RoF as well - w a t.

Stop mentioning facts! We don't appreciate that in this thread.
President of Eugen

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Razzmann » Fri 3 Feb 2017 01:35

captaincarnage wrote:you state in your preamble that Commonwealth's recon tab is bad and then proceed to do nothing about it.

Because it is supposed to have that as a weakness.

Akkku wrote:Well this patch is only a few (weeks?)/ days old. Just ask why and maybe they will fix it.

The list itself is fairly old. As a playable "patch" this is a few hours old.

User avatar
HrcAk47
Colonel
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sat 3 May 2014 18:00
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby HrcAk47 » Fri 3 Feb 2017 01:39

Coal143 wrote:
HrcAk47 wrote:Moderna is a proper candidate for a supertank, since it has a fair bit stronger armor additions including both active and passive armor on top of a T-72M1 based chassis.


How far could we go with this, realistically?


22 is achievable, IMO. 21 is playing it safe.

Moderna stats how I see it:

22/10/4/4
23AP
8 ROF
65% acc
55% stab.

You could go full 70% on the accuracy, though. It has all the bells and whistles for it. See my thread on the topic.

viewtopic.php?t=59240
The SEAD never bothered me anyway.

SMB Yugoslavia Retexture Mod, now released, v.1.0

captaincarnage
Major
Posts: 1915
Joined: Sat 29 Mar 2014 23:50
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby captaincarnage » Fri 3 Feb 2017 01:54

Razzmann wrote:Because it is supposed to have that as a weakness.


It has plenty of other weaknesses but whatever, still not impressed with whats been done tbh, but good luck.
I hope your buratino's die screaming.

Return to “Modding”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests