Razzmann wrote:We try to avoid having objectively worse / better IFVs for the same price, especially if they are effectively the same vehicle.
Balance-wise it's a good goal, but it's pretty hard to avoid that in the useful IFV cost range. And if AV differences don't count, aren't different Bradleys effectively the same vehicle as well?
If anything line infantry is more useful than it has ever been before. Jääkäri are overperforming very much
I know. Yet wouldn't call them old Jäger-level overperformers. One of the main reasons people take Jääkäri 90s so often are the transport options, after all.
Hence I wanted to avoid them being spammable, while retaining their utility, by cutting the number of cards and removing the spammy 5-pt transport option with more than 1 AV, as well as the better XA variants.
and it is not like Finland lacks either good fire support or good shock infantry.
This is true - note that I wanted to get rid of their go-to fire support unicorn as well.
They will still be a very strong (and most like must have) unit. We'd rather not remove the KT as it is certainly a very strong and for some people a problematic unit, Finland (and Baltic Front) really rely on it.
I'd rather see more KPTV BTR-80s instead of mandatory KT spam.
Changing base Jäkääri would not fix the issue at all since nobody takes them really.
Because Jääkäri '90s are totally superiour investment with the current Kk 62 stats.