BTW, since you have now reduced the Strv 122 to 1 card, do you consider improving its frontal armor? According to this:
http://www.fmv.se/Global/Bilder/Projekt ... rd%202.pdfThat is from the Swedish Defence Materiel Administration, which is an official agency.
Specifically pages 3-4.
Just to clarify, the Swedish tank trials were extremely rigorous and produced evaluations that were hundreds of pages long. Extensive fire tests against both the chassis and turret were conducted both in the bidding countries and in Sweden, and the latter was done both with the offered vehicles as well as when those vehicles were reinforced with a new ballistic armor insert developed by Åkers Krutbruk and IBD. It was found that protection was improved in some respects by as much as 50-100% on the M1A2 and (especially) the Leclerc with new ballistic armor inserts during the Swedish fire tests. This ballistic armor was applied to the Strv 122 as well.
The Strv 122 appears to be quite beastly as far as its protection is concerned, and I think it would be fair to represent that in the game with an improvement to its frontal armor compared to Leo 2A5. Reduce the Strv 121 to 1 card since its just a leased tank anyway. Considering the rather small number of heavier tanks they would have (1 card 23/23 SH and 1 card 23/19 H) it would not strike me as OP (especially given their rather small number of tank-removal options: no gunships, best fixed wing AP at 26, infantry ATGM at 2275 m).