Faustmann Balance Mod Release V1.06

User avatar
Partibrejker
Command Sergeant Major
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun 22 Feb 2015 22:14
Location: Elektronska Industrija, Yugoslavia
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Partibrejker » Thu 2 Feb 2017 17:44

mbetts wrote:
Partibrejker wrote:Hello, just popped in to suggest that, if you are able, put in the "reveal" dates for the coalition/nation changes that you are making, just info wise, nothing more than that.


Soon(tm)


welcome to the forum/salt mines mbetts, glad to see you :D
Spoiler : :

mbetts
Corporal
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu 9 Apr 2015 02:11
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby mbetts » Thu 2 Feb 2017 18:10

Partibrejker wrote:welcome to the forum/salt mines mbetts, glad to see you :D



I've been here nearly 2 years :lol: just don't comment
Image

User avatar
Mister Maf
Lieutenant
Posts: 1454
Joined: Sun 15 Dec 2013 23:15
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Mister Maf » Thu 2 Feb 2017 19:03

Sorry if this was already answered, but why does the Strv 122 get 0/2/0/1/0 instead of 0/2/1/0/0?
Image

User avatar
Razzmann
General
Posts: 7497
Joined: Fri 7 Mar 2014 15:29
Location: The land of flowing beer and Sauerkraut.
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Razzmann » Thu 2 Feb 2017 19:09

Mister Maf wrote:Sorry if this was already answered, but why does the Strv 122 get 0/2/0/1/0 instead of 0/2/1/0/0?

Because that is the availability of all superheavies :?

They all have 2 Trained / 1 Veteran and not 2 Trained / 1 Hardened.

User avatar
Mister Maf
Lieutenant
Posts: 1454
Joined: Sun 15 Dec 2013 23:15
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Mister Maf » Thu 2 Feb 2017 19:21

Razzmann wrote:
Mister Maf wrote:Sorry if this was already answered, but why does the Strv 122 get 0/2/0/1/0 instead of 0/2/1/0/0?

Because that is the availability of all superheavies :?

They all have 2 Trained / 1 Veteran and not 2 Trained / 1 Hardened.

Oh. Shows how much I play Commonwealth I guess. :lol:
Image

User avatar
Partizaan
Sergeant Major
Posts: 289
Joined: Thu 6 Dec 2012 15:21
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Partizaan » Thu 2 Feb 2017 20:04

Akkku wrote:Why does the AT12T not get the same stats as the PF98?
It had a ballistics computer and lrf in normal war game time frame. And so did the PzF3 T600 btw.


No offense but:
Please stop it, man, my brain hurts. You do realize it's their mod, it's about gameplay from their perspective and if you like it fine, if not go figure...
How many attempts did you make in this thread to start the 1000th discussion about real life weapon stats and their relation to each other? It's not really relevant.
Stop this inquisitive tone, write a book if you need to dump all your knowledge, let them work and make useful suggestions.

XanderTuron
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 591
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2016 23:17
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby XanderTuron » Thu 2 Feb 2017 20:18

Akkku wrote:Why does the AT12T not get the same stats as the PF98?
It had a ballistics computer and lrf in normal war game time frame. And so did the PzF3 T600 btw.

Maybe because the PF-98 is a fully realized weapon system while the AT12-T was a cancelled project so its potential capabilities are largely unknown and up for debate?
My mouth is moving, but nothing relevant is coming out. Also I cannot guarantee that my research is perfect or even remotely accurate.

I have low quality Wargame Red Dragon casts on my youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/user/XanderTuron

User avatar
Coal143
Master Sergeant
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed 27 Aug 2014 11:09
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Coal143 » Thu 2 Feb 2017 20:23

Dev Diary #3

Hello everyone, and welcome to yet another development diary for the Faustmann Balance Mod. Today we'll be talking about two coalitions that we're honestly quite happy with, and generally believe to be in a good place. In line with the philosophy of our mod, changes for both coalitions will be relatively minor and as such both will be sharing this dev diary.

Let's start with
Image

Commonwealth is arguably one of the most well rounded coalitions in the game, they have an extremely strong lineup and few relative weaknesses. These weaknesses make up what little "theme" Commonwealth has, namely; Heavily armored but slow and clunky tanks, and a fairly subpar recon tab.

While the lack of flavor is somewhat concerning, little needs to be done with Commonwealth as it does not seem to under or over-perform. Our changes are focused around consistency and preparing the coalition for our overall design philosophy.

Perhaps our most noticeable change is the addition of the Desert Warrior. Commonwealth has no decent IFV options beyond the powerful TH-495, and the Rarden proved difficult to buff realistically. We hope with the addition of the Desert Warrior, CMW will have some more versatility when picking transports.

Spoiler : :
Image

Image


Moving on to
Image

Eastern Bloc is similar in many regards to Commonwealth, as it exists as a coalition that possesses little in the way of weaknesses. Their theme is much more evident however: amazingly cost effective infantry, and a second-to-none capability to clear infantry from forests.

As with Commonwealth, no major changes are required and our main concern will be addressing NSWP's strange superheavy situation and plugging the gap in Eugen's very justified BMP-1 price nerf.

This brings us to our most notable change, the Spz BMP-3. While East Germany never fielded a BMP-3 in reality, they were looking to upgrade their BMP line of IFVs, and to speculate that they would have received the BMP-3 in a cold war gone hot scenario is not a great logical leap to make. The Spz BMP-3 is a stat copy of the Soviet BMP-3, sans the Arkan and is only available with Mot Schutzen '90. We hope this addition will plug the gap left by Eugen's (again very justified) BMP-1 nerf and return NSWP's IFV lineup to exceptional.

Spoiler : :
Image

Image


Stay tuned, as tomorrow we'll be talking about Eurocorps!
Image

Zugaryo
Private First-Class
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed 1 Feb 2017 14:45
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Zugaryo » Thu 2 Feb 2017 21:21

Since you're talking about flavour so much and people have pointed out Red Dragons should be good at infiltrating multiple times, how about giving NK's sniper team access to a Little Bird/MD 500D transport helo?

Make the transport only available to Jeongchaldae, give it no weapons and optics (model of the exceptional recon M 500D), but give it good or very good stealth. It wouldn't be OP - certainly not as much as other stealthy units like La Baguette, Tiger or M-84AN - but it would add to the flavour nicely and even make sense, since that's what the Little Bird was designed for: spec ops infiltration.

User avatar
Azaz3l
Brigadier
Posts: 3295
Joined: Sat 1 Oct 2011 10:38
Location: Bus 410
Contact:

Re: Faustmann Balance Mod Announcement

Postby Azaz3l » Thu 2 Feb 2017 21:29

PT-91 being more armored than T-80U and having more RoF as well - w a t.
Image

Return to “Modding”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests