HrcAk47 wrote:Coal143 wrote:HrcAk47 wrote:Moderna is a proper candidate for a supertank, since it has a fair bit stronger armor additions including both active and passive armor on top of a T-72M1 based chassis.
How far could we go with this, realistically?
22 is achievable, IMO. 21 is playing it safe.
Moderna stats how I see it:
You could go full 70% on the accuracy, though. It has all the bells and whistles for it. See my thread on the topic.
I feel that 70% should not be handed out like candy, it seems like every tank is getting 70% nowadays when functionally they have very similar same fire control to the M1 or Leopard 2 from 1980 (all the bells and whistles), and those two tanks are sitting at 60% effective.
Anyhow, with T-90S gone from the Norks, why not hand it to NSWP as their superheavy, probably to East Germany since it's "flavor" for vehicles is basically soviets without GLATGMS.
Then the lineup becomes
T-90S - 22FAV + 23 AP + 65%@9RPM. 170 pts
Moderna - 21 FAV + 23 AP + 60%@8 RPM. 160 pts
Twardy - 18 FAV + 22 AP + 60%@9 RPM. 140 pts. Twardy should be roughly comparable to T-72B with Kontakt 1, with better ERA but worse baseline armor.