Alright first thing first Rushattack, you need to chill the hell out, I didn't meant to offend you in any way.
Its a closed beta. Everyone is entitled to a opinion. No opinion is right or wrong.
What I meant by keep your opinion to yourself is simply in response to this statement of yours:
"Theres been so many games where squads have failed. there just blobs that run across the battlefield."
Blobbing is much worse in single infantry rts, just look at starcraft 2 and see how all the marines always
blob into single small circle, AOA should not be this kind of arcady rts. At least with squad infantries keep
their spacing with each other. So in my opinion this statement of yours is invalid and that's why I said it.
Again I didn't say you cannot post your opinions here, you're certainly entitle to, you just misinterpreted
my message. The others, myself included are certainly entitled to post ours as well.
squad is a true evolution to rts mechanics. Some of the greatest RTS games ever made used single units. Cnc games , starcraft games, ruse, warhammer, dawn of war, and age of empires.
Eh really? You just listed out several rts that are made great that uses squad system. ruse uses squad,
warhammer uses squad, dawn of war basically pioneered squad system, some C&C games uses squad too
(C&C3, Generals 2, even the original Generals with angry mobs)
I'm seriously wondering if you've actually played any of those RTS games to make such an "obviously true"
statement like this...
I cant even think of one other good RTS game that used squads besides coh ( which has no basebuilding thus squads works and has a different play style).
You really can't? I mean you just listed out several yourself lmao. And what what's with this "coh has no
basebuilding thus squads works", what pot have you been smoking, have you seriously even played coh?
Last I checked I still need to build a barrack to purchase infantries in that game...
And what does having base building or not have anything to do with this? Dawn of War have base building
and I'm sure that game certainly works...
I think you didnt read my answer. I would not be in favor of any squads. That means squads already made from the barracks or squads made in the battlefield.
I certainly read your answer, why are you being so selfish and only think for yourself, when you are not even
affected by this since you can still play with your single soldier as before. But for the plenty of other peoples
supporting this idea, this means they can at least have the game playable at an acceptable level of micro.
Eugen is not making a game to suit YOUR specific taste, remember this. Like Cryotech is saying, you're just
being too close minded.
They're making a game suited to the vast majority of their community, something which their fans support.
Which is why they're having a beta to receive feedbacks and advice from their community.
Dont be telling people to keep there opinions . Its a community with open ideas. Just because somebody doesnt have the same opinion as you , you shouldnt get all upset about it.
Good that's well said actually, just hope you can understand this yourself, since it applies really well to what
you're currently doing.
This isnt bf4. This is a open forum.
Dafuq? Who said this is bf4, that isn't even the same genre...
Ive been following this game a long long time. Eugene has alot of things in place to make this game great.
A long long time like last August when it was first announced? So have I actually.
And it's EUGEN not Eugene, it's not a name...
Single unit infantry with secondary abilities that can capture pows, garrison buildings, and get loaded in vehicles and helicoptors for mobile transportation.
The same thing that can be done with the custom squad system, and much easier to do actually.
And that's about it, ohh next time try dividing your post into paragraphs, that big blob you've written is just
painful to read. (Again opinions so don't get mad)