Any update for 10 v 10 match's?

[Opticalx]

I mean it will be badass!
also having FFA's with 20 people would be complete chaos!

[Araton]

Seeing that the game will come out in September and the devs have performance issues with zooming, I don't see this happening. I think a 4v4 will be the maximum that they can cram out. Which I am totally cool with.

[GeneralGonzo]

Don´t Forget FFA with maybe 8 guys !

[Gnougnou]

20vs20, then 10vs10, and now only 4vs4 ? Nahh, don't tell me that...

[Araton]

20vs20, then 10vs10, and now only 4vs4 ? Nahh, don't tell me that...

Do not despair my friend!

6v6 or 8v8 could come in an expansion pack and this is no trolling. I'm just being realistic.

I think the game just needs more development time. The 2 months beta won't be enough. I also think this game might need 4 or 8 months of beta status to become stable (bug/crash free) and balanced. The problem is but the lack of money :-/
Act of Aggression is not doing well on Steam right now and if it doesn't come out in September Eugene might face some serious lose of money on their side due to prolonged development.

That is why I think 4v4 and 15 multiplayer maps are here to stay until the first expansion comes out.

[goodman528]

Wargame had 10v10, I'm sure a lot of code can be re-used from wargame, so maybe we will see it by release time.I'm more looking forward to the campaign.

[SpeisCheese]

Why does everyone need to do like DICE does with their Battlefield series?

[Salsifi]

Wargame had 10v10, I'm sure a lot of code can be re-used from wargame, so maybe we will see it by release time.I'm more looking forward to the campaign.

With a 10 vs 10 game you will never fight more than half of the opposing team in the entire game according to game pace and scale.

AoA is definitely not made for such a number of players.

6vs6 should be the limit if they are not stuck to 4vs4

[frostypooky]

Why does everyone need to do like DICE does with their Battlefield series?

in what regard?
Battlefield was always best on 32-40p servers, from 1942 to 4.

i agree that anything above 6v6 would be ridiculous for the game's pace and economy.

[SpeisCheese]

Why does everyone need to do like DICE does with their Battlefield series?

in what regard?
Battlefield was always best on 32-40p servers, from 1942 to 4.

i agree that anything above 6v6 would be ridiculous for the game's pace and economy.

I talk about development. If you played BF4 Beta, you thought that BF4 Full release would be fine. It was horrible. more bugs in Fulkl release than in Beta. BF3 got still many bugs. You know why? DICE is forced to develop a game as fast as they can. No time to make many tests to find even the smallest bugs. Eugen is a small team. They already delayed many times release date, which is good for having more time to test the game, but with this speed I fear that many things they said 1 year ago won't happen, even for final release.