Things that were over nerfed[imo]

User avatar
EliteSniper
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 22 May 2013 07:28
Location: Stratis

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby EliteSniper » Mon 15 Jul 2013 03:11

Gopblin wrote:Not sure what the problem is, miniguns wipe Mi8 choppers from the sky, while Mi24 are way too expensive for initial insertions.
Also, Dornier 205 was used to drop Jagers all over the place, which was a problem.
And which helo has price increased from 5 to 15 points? Don't remember this in the patch notes.

Best wishes,
Daniel.


Sweet, yet the huey has to come like 500m close to it, which if it's in AA space or if there is infantry around ummmm, you won't see it flying anymore. :roll:

To support infantry, okay yet again it has to come close enough to engage and all a infantry unit has to do is look at it for a second and down it goes. The MI-8 has like 1.5km range and doesn't need to be right up on the enemy to fire. That's just another reason it was overpriced.

Gopblin
Major-General
Posts: 3620
Joined: Thu 24 May 2012 19:10
Contact:

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby Gopblin » Mon 15 Jul 2013 03:17

You might wanna look at the armory stats there, you're off by a few hundred meters.

But seeing how you imagined some choppers were changed from 5 to 15 price, this is hardly surprising.

I'm all for meaningful complaints, heck I make a ton, but at least get your facts correct. Also, you were complaining about initial helo deployments - no AA around at that time, and the enemy generally won't even have time to drop inf; moreover, NATO wins those scraps every time due to miniguns and cheap AA helos.

Best wishes,
Daniel.
Nationality? - Russian.
Occupation? - No, no, just visiting.

User avatar
Vasily Krysov
Colonel
Posts: 2671
Joined: Mon 2 Apr 2012 09:27

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby Vasily Krysov » Mon 15 Jul 2013 03:28

Well he quit the game you see so he can't check the numbers.

Btw if you disagree with him you are a troll by default. Somehow.

User avatar
Xeno426
Carbon 13
Posts: 11965
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 21:27
Location: Acheron, Hadley's Hope
Contact:

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby Xeno426 » Mon 15 Jul 2013 03:40

busboy wrote:Yup. I personally think it needs its 2 frontal armor back and be restricted to USMC only decks. Stug had this proposal months ago now.

I doubt the devs are going to create a new restriction class for one unit.
Image
CloakandDagger wrote:And you're one of the people with the shiny colored name. No wonder the game is in the state it's in.

Gopblin
Major-General
Posts: 3620
Joined: Thu 24 May 2012 19:10
Contact:

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby Gopblin » Mon 15 Jul 2013 03:50

I think he means Marine deck restriction. Which would still make it available to mixed NATO, which is what 50% or so players use.
Not that I mind - I think the current price is rather steep for an Armor1 vehicle, maybe nerf ACC a bit and give it back armor 2.

Best wishes,
Daniel.
Nationality? - Russian.
Occupation? - No, no, just visiting.

solaris
Lieutenant
Posts: 1400
Joined: Mon 13 May 2013 06:10
Contact:

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby solaris » Mon 15 Jul 2013 03:52

Gopblin wrote:I think he means Marine deck restriction. Which would still make it available to mixed NATO, which is what 50% or so players use.


Do you have the source of that 50% statistic handy?
Anecdotes do not count for game balance.

User avatar
Xeno426
Carbon 13
Posts: 11965
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 21:27
Location: Acheron, Hadley's Hope
Contact:

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby Xeno426 » Mon 15 Jul 2013 03:59

Gopblin wrote:I think he means Marine deck restriction.

They're already limited to "Type: Marine" only.
Image
CloakandDagger wrote:And you're one of the people with the shiny colored name. No wonder the game is in the state it's in.

User avatar
EliteSniper
Chief Warrant Officer
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 22 May 2013 07:28
Location: Stratis

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby EliteSniper » Mon 15 Jul 2013 04:00

What I just seen, enrages me even more.

A 20 point gunship! OMFG why is the Huey 20 points when it doesn't have the range, or does damage the MI-8 does?!?!
http://i.imgur.com/nkfkvcy.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/2WqRUc1.jpg

Is this some troll Eugen is doing?

User avatar
DinDong
Sergeant First-Class
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue 23 Apr 2013 19:48
Contact:

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby DinDong » Mon 15 Jul 2013 04:02

Xeno426 wrote:
Gopblin wrote:I think he means Marine deck restriction.

They're already limited to "Type: Marine" only.



I think he meant USMC as in americans prototype

User avatar
Xeno426
Carbon 13
Posts: 11965
Joined: Tue 13 Mar 2012 21:27
Location: Acheron, Hadley's Hope
Contact:

Re: Things that were over nerfed[imo]

Postby Xeno426 » Mon 15 Jul 2013 04:07

DinDong wrote:I think he meant USMC as in americans prototype

If they mean prototype, they should just say "Prototype". Why people insist on saying "USMC Prototype" if they only mean "prototype" I do not know.
Image
CloakandDagger wrote:And you're one of the people with the shiny colored name. No wonder the game is in the state it's in.

Return to “Wargame : AirLand Battle”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests