eMeM wrote:Why should PACT players be upset because of that? Hehehe, silly them.thehitman009 wrote:PACT couldn't shoot down NATO helos?
That was sarcasm that didn't translate well. NATO helos were easily countered by PACT AA like Tusunga M with its radar off.
Mr0Buggy wrote:You should have seen the comments under the previous patch which pretty much lowered availability of Soviet Armor. NATO fanboys were waggling their sausages left and right over it. I guess it's just right that it's PACT homeboy's turn to be doing the same now.
Again, I could care less about who's a "fanboy" of what. Also, I wasn't on the forums during that time, so perhaps this is some sort of payback thing. Who knows. I don't really care if someone gets their much deserved chance to ooze all over a patch. These are childish, petty issues in my opinion.
I'm talking about balance here.
Gopblin wrote:Actually, this patch did wonders for my NATO spamdecks. Not a big fan of heavies, I actually enjoy playing NATO a lot more now that PACT actually can put up a fight.
So what if I don't like playing spamdecks? Should I be forced to do that? Hell why don't we just get rid of the deck creation system and force everyone to play a certain way? I think this is against the foundations of the game.
As for PACT actually putting up a fight, who were you playing before? Our experiences are vastly different in this realm.